期刊文献+

基于模糊置信理论的全电力船舶推进FMEA评估 被引量:4

FMEA Evaluation of All-electric Ship Propulsion Based on Fuzzy Confidence Theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于全电力船舶推进系统结构组成复杂,且海洋环境恶劣,面临着系统故障频发、安全苛求等问题。针对传统风险优先数评估存在的缺陷,提出了一种基于模糊置信理论的故障模式影响模糊评估方法。利用信息熵与定性分析融合的综合权重确定专家意见的可信度权重,各风险因子相对权重通过语言变量和模糊等级来评价,并基于模糊置信结构给出各风险因子及相对权重的整体模糊置信等级评价,最终结合模糊置信决策矩阵,实现对各故障模式模糊置信评价的解进行模糊化处理。最后以推进子系统典型故障模式为例,验证了所提方法的有效性。 All-electric ship propulsion system is prone to suffer from system failures and security threats for its complex functional structure and poor operation environment. In view of the defects of traditional risk priority number(RPN) evaluation, an improved evaluation method for the failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA) is proposed based on the fuzzy confidence theory. The comprehensive weight based on the fusion of information entropy and qualitative analysis is employed to determine the credibility weights of expert opinions. Each risk factor and its relative weight are evaluated by linguistic terms and fuzzy ratings. With the fuzzy confidence structure, the overall fuzzy confidence level evaluation of each risk factor and its relative weight are given. According to the fuzzy confidence decision matrix, the fuzzy confidence evaluation of each failure mode is defuzzified. Finally, a typical failure mode of the propulsion subsystem is taken as an example to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
作者 刘胜 郭晓杰 张兰勇 谭银朝 LIU Sheng;GUOXiao-jie;ZHANG Lan-yong;TAN Yin-chao(College of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering,Harbin Engineering University,Harbin 150001,China;Shandong Shipbuilding Control Engineering and Intelligent System Engineering Technology Research Center,Weihai 264300,China)
出处 《控制工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第9期1807-1813,共7页 Control Engineering of China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51579047) 山东省重点研发计划资助项目(2018GHY115001)。
关键词 全电力船舶推进 故障模式与影响分析 模糊置信结构 风险优先排序 All-electric ship propulsion failure mode and effect analysis fuzzy confidence structure risk prioritization
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献76

  • 1余建星,周清基,杜尊峰,邵志卫,冯加果,柴松.基于RCM的海上油气生产装置设备资产管理[J].天津大学学报,2012,45(1):36-42. 被引量:8
  • 2崔勇,孙枫.基于质量功能配置的模糊设计方案优选模型[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(2):220-224. 被引量:5
  • 3王淼,戴剑锋,周双喜,鲁宗相,陈寿孙,韩朝珍.全电力推进船舶电力系统的数字仿真[J].电工技术学报,2006,21(4):62-67. 被引量:32
  • 4周海京.遇今.故障模式,影响及危害性分析与故障树分析[M].北京:航空工业出版社,2003.
  • 5Price C J.Taylor N S.Automated multiple failure FMEA[J].Reliability engineering and system safety,2002,76(1):1-10.
  • 6Hawkins P G,Woollons D J.Failure modes and effects analysis of complex engineering systews using functional mdels[J].Artificial Intelligence in Engineering,1998,12(4):375-397.
  • 7Cassanelli G,Mura G,Fontini F,et al.Failure analysis assisted FMEA[J].Microelectronics and Reliability,2006,46(11):1795-1799.
  • 8Teng SH,Ho SY.Failure mode and effects analysis an integrated approach for product design and process control[J].International Journal of Quafity & Reliability Management,1996,13(5):8-26.
  • 9国家军用标准《故障模式影响及危害性分析程序实施指南》[S].北京:国防科工委军用标准化中心,1994.
  • 10吴佳梁,王广良,魏振山.风力机可靠性工程[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2011.

共引文献252

同被引文献30

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部