摘要
学术图书是研究成果中最主要的一种类型。开放存取作为一种信息共享机制,已应用至学术图书领域。为了解我国开放存取平台学术图书保障现状,以2019年图书馆学硕博士学位论文的参考文献为样本,通过引文分析法、网络调查法分析对比大学数字图书馆国际合作计划(CADAL)、国家科技图书文献中心(NSTL)、中国科学院知识服务平台学术图书开放存取资源的保障量,同时将超星电子图书数据库作为对照组,比较其资源结构的异同,结果发现我国开放存取平台对学术图书的保障体现出保障率不足、保障图书侧重点不同等特征。从提高保障率、实现开放存取学术图书的共建共享、重视古籍保障三个方面提出相关建议。
Academic books are one of the most important types of research results.As an information sharing mechanism, open access has been applied to academic books in recent years.In order to understand the guarantee rate of academic books on the open access platform in China, taking the references of the master’s and doctoral dissertations of Library Science in 2019 as samples, this paper analyzes the guarantee amount of academic books of CADAL,NSTL and Knowledge Service Platform for Chinese Academy of Sciences by using citation analysis and network survey methods, and takes Chaoxing e-book database as the control group to compare the similarities and differences of the resource structure.The results show that the open access platforms in China have the characteristics of insufficient guarantee rate and lay emphasis on different aspects of academic book guarantee.This paper puts forward relevant suggestions from three aspects: improving the guarantee rate, realizing the co-construction and sharing of open access academic books, and paying attention to the guarantee of ancient books.
作者
刘凤仪
叶继元
Liu Fengyi;Ye Jiyuan
出处
《图书馆学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第18期49-56,共8页
Research on Library Science
基金
国家社会科学基金重大课题“新时代我国文献信息资源保障体系重构研究”(项目编号:19ZDA346)的研究成果之一。
关键词
开放存取
学术图书
文献保障
古籍保障
open access
academic book
literature guarantee
ancient book guarantee
