期刊文献+

基于PK/PD理论与肾小球滤过率的变化评价不同剂量左氧氟沙星对肾功能不全伴肺部感染患者疗效的影响 被引量:1

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:基于PK/PD理论与肾小球滤过率的变化评价不同剂量左氧氟沙星对肾功能不全伴肺部感染患者疗效的影响。方法:选取医院2017年10月—2019年10月收治的肾功能不全伴肺部感染患者56例病历资料,按左氧氟沙星给药剂量的不同将其分为高剂量组和低剂量组,每组28例;低剂量组患者给予盐酸左氧氟沙星注射液0.3 g,静脉滴注,q12h;高剂量组患者给予盐酸左氧氟沙星注射液0.5 g,静脉滴注,q24h;2组患者均治疗7 d后评估其疗效,比较2组患者治疗前痰培养中病原菌种类及治疗后的总有效率、不良反应发生率的差异,以及高剂量组患者治疗前后肾功能指标即血肌酐(Scr)、尿素氮(BUN)、血β_(2)-微球蛋白(β_(2)-MG)水平的变化情况。结果:2组患者治疗前检出病原菌种类和不良反应发生率经组间比较其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);高剂量组患者治疗后的总有效率高于低剂量组(89.29%vs 64.29%,P<0.05),治疗前后的Scr、BUN、β_(2)-MG测得值经组间比较其差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:采用静脉滴注左氧氟沙星0.5 g、q24h的治疗方案对肾功能不全伴肺部感染患者的疗效优于低剂量,且对肾功能和安全性无明显影响。
作者 白倩
出处 《抗感染药学》 2021年第8期1139-1142,共4页 Anti-infection Pharmacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1Munar MY,Singh H.Drug dosing adjustments in patients with chronic kidney disease[J].Am Fam Physician,2007,75(10):1487-1496.
  • 2Gabardi S,Abramson S.Drug dosing in chronic kidney disease[J].Med Clin North Am,2005,89(3):649-687.
  • 3Levey AS,Stevens LA,Schmid CIl,et al. A new equation to es:i mate glomerular filtration rate[J]. Ann Intern Med, 200.9, 15(1 (9) :604-612.
  • 4Patel A,Frame K. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in pallia- rive care patients:comparison of the Cockroft-Gault and abbrevia ted modification of diet in renal disease formulas is it relevant to linical practice[J]. BMJ Support Palliat (;are, 2014,4 ( 1 ) : 59 -63.
  • 5Inker LA,Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C[J]. N Engl j Med,2012,367(1) :20-29.
  • 6Pei X,Liu Q,He J,et al. Are cystatin C-based equations superior to creatlnine-based equations for estimatingGFR in Chinese elderly population[J]. Int Urol Nephrol,2012,44 (6) : 1877-1884.
  • 7Inker LA, Shaffi K, Levey AS. Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration creatinine equation: better risk predictions [J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2012,5 (3) : 303-306.
  • 8Levey AS,Stevens LA. Estimating GFR using the CKD Epidemi- ology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) ereatinine equation: more accu- rate GFR estimates, lower CKD prevalence estimates,and better risk predictionsrJ]. Am J Kidney Dis,2010,55(4) :622-627.
  • 9Inker LA,Levey AS. Pro:estimating GFR using the chronic kid ney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2009 creati- nine equation: the time for change is how[J]. Nephrol Dial Trans- plant,2013,28(6) :1390-1396.
  • 10Du X, Liu L, Hu B, et al. Is the chronic kidney disease epidemiolo- gy collaboration four-level race equation better than the cystatin Cequation[J]. Nephrology (Carlton) ,2012,17(4) :407-414.

共引文献30

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部