摘要
“天人合一”说,在中国古代思想史上至少有三种形态。第一种形态是《庄子》的“人与天一”,其观点是天人相分别。第二种形态是董仲舒的“天人一也”,其观点是天人相分而相似。第三种形态是张载的“天人合一”,其内涵是天人合为一个生命体。上述三种形态之中的第一种和第三种形态所表述的观点是直接对立的。因此,从逻辑学的角度来说,天人合一,作为一种现代表述,是一个无效的命题。
The theory of unity of man and nature has at least three forms in the history of ancient Chinese thought.The first form is "Man and Heaven as Separate" in Zhuangzi,which holds that heaven and man are different. The second form is Dong Zhongshu’s "Heaven and Man as Similar",which holds that heaven and man are separate and similar. The third form is Zhang Zai’s "Unity of Heaven and Man",which means that heaven and man are combined into one living body. The views expressed in the first and third forms are in direct opposition to each other. Thus,from a logical point of view,the oneness of man and nature,as a modern statement,is an invalid proposition.
作者
沈顺福
SHEN Shun-fu(Center for Zhouyi&Ancient Chinese Philosophy,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China)
出处
《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2022年第3期64-71,共8页
Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金
2020年国家社会科学基金后期资助重点项目“传统儒家心灵哲学研究”(20FZXA005)。
关键词
天人合一
《庄子》
董仲舒
张载
unity of man and nature
Zhuangzi
Dong Zhongshu
Zhang Zai
