摘要
我们的社会正迈向大数据、信息化、网络化的场域,面对网络纠纷的井喷式增长,传统法院由于“案多人少”或审判技术等原因无法作出有效回应,此时三家互联网法院相继设立。互联网法院作为网络技术与现代司法深度融合的产物,其采用“线上审理”解纷方式为其他法院提供了有效样本,以北京、杭州、广州互联网法院的运行实践为蓝本,可将其概括为三种模式,即以信息公开为核心的网络型法院、以办公智能为核心的网络型法院、以庭审智慧为核心的网络型法院,并为三种运行模式尝试建立了科学、合理与专业的量化评估体系,其中,量化指标体系的设计与应用应当遵循主客观指标均衡原则、程序性原则、合理性原则、科学性原则和可实践性原则,形成以信息公开、庭审智慧、办公智能化为核心的量化指标体系。当然,需要谨慎对待量化指标体系,防止盲目陷入“自说自话”的陷阱,陷入“高分论”的陷阱,同时防止量化指标体系演变为互联网法院绩效评估的“证据”。
Our society is engaged in the reform regarding big data. In the face of the explosion of network disputes to which traditional courts cannot respond effectively because of the situation of “ more cases but fewer judges” and traditional trial technology. At this stage, three Internet courts were established in China. As a product of the deep integration of network technology and modern justice, the Internet courts used an “online trial” to resolve disputes to provide effective samples for other courts, the operation modes of Internet courts can be summarized into three models based on the operating practices of the Internet courts in Beijing, Hangzhou, and Guangzhou, that is,Internet court with information disclosure as the core, Internet court with artificial intelligence as the core, and Internet courts with forensic technology as the core. This article attempts to establish a scientific, reasonable, and professional quantitative evaluation system for the above three operating modes. The design and application of the quantitative index system should follow the subjective and objective index balance principle, procedural principle,rationality principle, scientific principle and operability principle to form a quantitative index system with information disclosure, modernization of court trial, and artificial intelligence as the core. Of course, the quantitative indicator system needs to be treated carefully to prevent blindly falling into the trap of “talking to oneself” and the trap of“high score theory”, while preventing the quantitative indicator system from becoming the “evidence” of Internet court performance evaluation.
作者
自正法
Zi Zhengfa(Law School,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044)
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期65-75,共11页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“未成年人刑事实体与程序衔接路径研究(21BFX182)”的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
互联网法院
量化指标体系
智能办公
信息公开
庭审智慧
Internet court
quantitative index system
smart office
information disclosure
court trial wisdom
