期刊文献+

紫杉醇联合索拉非尼治疗原发性肝癌的近远期疗效 被引量:2

Short-term and long-term efficacy of paclitaxel combined with sorafenib in primary liver cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨紫杉醇联合索拉非尼治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效以及对预后的影响。方法将125例原发性肝癌患者按照治疗方法的不同分为A组(n=62,替吉奥联合索拉非尼)和B组(n=63,紫杉醇联合索拉非尼),比较两组患者临床疗效、不良反应、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)及生活质量。结果B组患者总有效率高于A组患者,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。治疗期间,B组患者中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、肝功能损伤、乏力、手足皮肤反应发生率均低于A组患者,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。B组患者PFS、OS均明显长于A组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。治疗后,两组患者健康调查简表(SF-36)评分均高于治疗前,且B组患者SF-36评分高于A组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论紫杉醇联合索拉非尼治疗原发性肝癌患者可提高总有效率,减少不良反应,在改善预后及提高生活质量中具有一定的临床价值。 Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of paclitaxel combined with sorafenib in primary liver cancer and the effect on prognosis.Method A total of 125 patients with primary liver cancer were divided into group A(n=62,S-1+sorafenib)and group B(n=63,paclitaxel+sorafenib).The clinical efficacy,adverse reactions,progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS),and quality of life were compared between the two groups.Result The total effective rate in group B was higher than that in group A(P<0.05).The incidences of neutropenia,thrombocytopenia,liver function damage,fatigue and cutaneous reaction of hand and foot in group B were lower than those in group A(P<0.05).The PFS and OS in group B were longer than those in group A(P<0.01).After treatment,the scores of the MOS 36-item short form health survey(SF-36)in both groups increased significantly,and the score in group B was significantly higher than that in group A(P<0.05).Conclusion The combined treatment of paclitaxel and sorafenib in patients with primary liver cancer can improve the total effective rate and reduce the adverse reactions,and has certain clinical value in improving the prognosis and quality of life.
作者 孙媛 罗建梅 米晶晶 SUN Yuan;LUO Jianmei;MI Jingjing(Department of Pharmacy,Yulin No.2 Hospital,Yulin 719000,Shaanxi,China;Department of Medicine,Yulin No.2 Hospital,Yulin 719000,Shaanxi,China)
出处 《癌症进展》 2022年第15期1601-1603,共3页 Oncology Progress
关键词 紫杉醇 替吉奥 索拉非尼 原发性肝癌 paclitaxel S-1 sorafenib primary liver cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献125

  • 1杨学宁,吴一龙.实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准——RECIST[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):85-90. 被引量:1621
  • 2邓三宁,李影萍,熊小兵.甲胎蛋白(AFP)增高与肝脏疾病的探讨[J].职业卫生与病伤,2004,19(4):288-289. 被引量:2
  • 3马建辉.重视实体瘤疗效评价标准的变革——RECIST概要[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(2):77-79. 被引量:39
  • 4张凌云,于萍,刘云鹏,滕月娥,赵明芳,金波.肿瘤患者化疗期间的生活质量调查与分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2007,15(6):860-862. 被引量:35
  • 5Smith BD,Smith GL, Hurria A,etal. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: Burdens upon an aging, changing nation[J]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(17) :2758 - 2765.
  • 6Ware JE,Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 - item short - form health survey (SF- 36): Conceptual framework and item selection[J]. Med Care,1992,30(6):473 -483.
  • 7Hays RD,Sherhourne CD,Mazel R. User's manual for the Medi- cal Outcomes Study (MOS) core measures of health - related quality of life[M]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1995 : 1.
  • 8Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally impor- tant differences in EQ- 5D utility and VAS scores in cancer [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2007,5 : 70.
  • 9Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index - Cancer: De- velopment and validation[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1984,2 (5) :472 - 483.
  • 10Cella DF,Tulsky DS,Gray G,et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure[J]. J Clin Onco1,1993,11(3) :570 - 579.

共引文献657

同被引文献26

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部