期刊文献+

虚拟现实技术在儿童深龋治疗中对牙科畏惧的干预效果研究 被引量:10

Intervention effect of virtual reality technology on dental fear in the treatment of deep caries in children
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估虚拟现实(VR)技术在儿童牙科畏惧症(CDF)患儿深龋治疗过程中,减少疼痛感知和焦虑水平的有效性,分析VR技术缓解患儿DF的效果。方法选择5~8岁因患深龋需行活髓切断治疗的患儿为研究对象,经儿童畏惧调查量表-牙科分量表(CFSS-DS)测评共筛选出160例,其中120例为轻度CDF(CFSS-DS评分为16~30分),40例为中度CDF(CFSS-DS评分为31~45分)。将轻度和中度CDF患儿各自随机分组,分别为轻度畏惧VR组(组1,60例)、轻度畏惧告知-演示-操作(TSD)组(组2,60例)、中度畏惧VR组(组3,20例)和中度畏惧TSD组(组4,20例)。组1和组3戴用VR眼镜(VR组)进行干预,组2和组4采用TSD行为引导(TSD组)进行干预。通过心理测评、合作行为评估、生理反应(心率)、疼痛等级、治疗依从性评估2种干预措施缓解儿童焦虑和疼痛的效果。采用VR眼镜适用性评估量表分析其适用性。结果160例患儿均完成治疗。治疗开始前,VR组CFSS-DS评分和心率与TSD组比较均无明显差异(P>0.05)。VR组与TSD组比较,治疗前后CFSS-DS评分差值、治疗中心率(中度畏惧组)、疼痛等级、治疗依从性的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);而轻度畏惧组治疗中的心率、各组治疗前和治疗中心率差值与基线比值的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4组内比较,治疗中的心率值均高于治疗前(P<0.01),除轻度畏惧TSD组治疗前后CFSS-DS评分的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)外,其余3组治疗前后CFSS-DS评分的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。患儿对VR眼镜适用性方面评价较高。结论VR技术在降低CDF患儿的焦虑心理及疼痛感知程度上优于TSD引导,而在降低患儿生理反应(心率)方面的效果与TSD组无明显差异。患儿对VR眼镜的应用具有较高的满意度。 Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the virtual reality(VR)technology in reducing pain perception and anxiety level in children with dental fear(DF)during the treatment of deep caries and analyze the effect of VR technology in relieving DF.Methods Children aged 5-8 years who need pulpotomy for deep caries were selected as research object.A total of 160 children were screened out by the children’s fear survey schedule-dental subscale(CFSS-DS),of which 120 and 40 cases were mild(CFSS-DS score=16-30)and moderate(CFSS-DS score=31-45)DF.Children with mild and moderate DF were randomly divided into four groups:mild DF VR(group 1,60 cases),mild DF Tell-Show-Do(TSD;group 2,60 cases),moderate DF VR(group 3,20 cases),and moderate DF TSD(group 4,20 cases)groups.Groups 1 and 3 were intervened by wearing VR glasses(VR group),whereas groups 2 and 4 were intervened by TSD behavior guidance(TSD group).The effects of two intervention measures on alleviating children’s DF were evaluated using psychological evaluation(i.e.,CFSS-DS),cooperative behavior evaluation,physiological response(heart rate),pain degree,and treatment compliance evaluation.VR glasses’applicability assessment scale was used to analyze its applicability.Results All 160 children completed treatment.No significant difference in the CFSS-DS score and heart rate before treatment was observed between VR and TSD groups(P>0.05).The CFSS-DS score differences before and after treatment,heart rate during treatment(in group 3),pain grade,and treatment compliance of TSD and VR groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).However,no significant difference was observed in heart rate during treatment between groups 1 and 2(P>0.05).The ratio of the heart rate difference(before and during treatment)to baseline was also not statistically significant(P>0.05).The intragroup comparison and heart rates during treatment were higher than those before treatment in four groups(P<0.01).Significant differences in CFSS-DS score differences before and after treatment were observed in groups 1,3,and 4(P<0.05)but not in group 2(P>0.05).Children had high evaluation on the applicability of VR glasses.Conclu⁃sion The VR technology was superior to TSD guidance in reducing the anxiety and pain degree of children with DF,but no significant difference was observed in reducing the physiological response(heart rate)of children compared with TSD guidance.Children were satisfied with the application of VR glasses.
作者 任海霞 刘颍凤 梁慧敏 李家勇 温春琴 王春梅 Ren Haixia;Liu Yingfeng;Liang Huimin;Li Jiayong;Wen Chunqin;Wang Chunmei(College of Nursing,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300070,China;Dept.of Stomatology,Tianjin Rehabilitation Center,Tianjin 300191,China)
出处 《国际口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2022年第5期529-536,共8页 International Journal of Stomatology
关键词 虚拟现实技术 告知-演示-操作行为引导 儿童 牙科畏惧症 疼痛 virtual reality technology Tell-Show-Do behavior guidance children dental fear pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献61

  • 1李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:493
  • 2凌均棨,王阿丹.老年口腔健康评价指数(GOHAI)中文版的研制[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2003,1(3):129-133. 被引量:65
  • 3刘艺敏,韩杰,朱炎,邓常文,刘亮,李雷佳.上海市区成人牙科畏惧症924例调查分析[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2007,28(2):97-99. 被引量:13
  • 4Nakai Y,Hirakawa T,Milgrom P,et al.The Children′s Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale in Japan.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol,2005,33(3):196-204.
  • 5Ten BM,Veerkamp JS,Hoogstraten J,et al.Childhood dental fear in the Netherlands:prevalence and normative data.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol,2002,30(2):101-107.
  • 6Rantavuori K,Lahti S,Seppa L,et al.Dental fear of Finnish children in the light of different measures of dental fear.Acta Odontol Scand,2005,63(4):239-244.
  • 7Versloot J,Veerkamp JS,Hoogstraten J.Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs.traditional syringe:comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children.Eur J Oral Sci,2005,113(6):488-493.
  • 8Klaassen MA,Veerkamp JS,Hoogstraten J.Dental fear,communication,and behavioural management problems in children referred for dental problems.Int J Paediatr Dent,2007,17(6):469-477.
  • 9Aartman IHA,Everdingen T,Hoogstraten J,et al.Appraisal of behavioural measurement techniques for assessing dental anxiety and fear in children.J Psychopathol Behav Assess,1996,18(2):153-171.
  • 10Scherer MW,Nakamura CY.A fear survey schedule for children (FSS-FC):a factor analytic comparison with manifest anxiety (CMAS).Behav Res Ther,1968,6(2):173-182.

共引文献78

同被引文献119

引证文献10

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部