期刊文献+

甘肃省某三甲医院2016-2020年临床分离菌耐药性 被引量:6

Drug resistance of clinical strains isolated from a three-A hospital of Gansu Province from 2016 to 2020
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解2016-2020年甘肃省某三甲医院临床分离菌株分布情况及对抗菌药物的耐药性变迁,为临床合理使用抗菌药物提供依据。方法 收集2016年1月-2020年12月医院临床分离菌,根据美国临床和实验室标准化协会(CLSI)标准判读药敏结果,采用WHONET 5.6软件和SPSS 26.0软件进行数据分析。结果 2016-2020年共收集非重复菌株15 889株,其中革兰阴性菌10 786株(67.9%),革兰阳性菌5 103株(32.1%)。排名前五位分离菌为大肠埃希菌3 340株(21.0%)、金黄色葡萄球菌2 130株(13.4%)、肺炎克雷伯菌1 605株(10.1%)、鲍氏不动杆菌1 582株(10.0%)、铜绿假单胞菌1 138株(7.2%)。大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)菌株分别为2 061株(61.7%)和600株(37.4%),耐碳青霉烯大肠埃希菌(CRECO)、耐碳青霉烯鲍氏不动杆菌(CRAB)、耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)的检出率分别为1.1%(37/3340)、83.6%(1323/1582)和5.0%(80/1605),耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(MRCNS)的检出率分别为44.1%(940/2130)和74.6%(381/511),未发现对万古霉素和利奈唑胺耐药的葡萄球菌属和肠球菌属菌株。结论 细菌耐药状况日益严重,耐碳青霉烯类革兰阴性菌的检出率持续上升,应引起临床高度重视,并合理选用抗菌药物,采取有效措施,以控制和减少院内感染的风险,同时做好细菌耐药监测工作。 OBJECTIVE To understand the distribution and drug resistance of clinical strains isolated from a three-A hospital of Gansu Province between 2016 and 2020 so as to provide guidance for reasonable clinical use of antibiotics. METHODS The clinical strains were collected from the hospital from Jan 2016 to Dec 2020. The result of drug susceptibility testing was interpreted on basis of standards of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI), and the data were analyzed by using WHONET5.6 software and SPSS 26.0 software. RESULTS A total of 15889 strains of non-repetitive isolates were collected between 2016 and 2020, 10786(67.9%) of which were gram-negative bacteria, 5103(32.1%) were gram-positive bacteria. Escherichia coli(3340 strains, 21.0%), Staphylococcus aureus(2130 strains, 13.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae(1605 strains, 10.1%), Acinetobacter baumannii(1582 strains, 10.0%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa( 1138 strains, 7.2%) ranked the top 5 species of isolates. There were 2061(61.7%) strains of extended-spectrum β-lactamases(ESBLs)-producing E.coli and 600(37.4%) strains of ESBLs-producing K.pneumoniae. The isolation rates of carbapenem-resistant E.coli(CREO), carbapenem-resistant A.baumannii(CRAB) and carbapenem-resistant K.pneumoniae(CRKP) were 1.1%(37/3340), 83.6%(1323/1582) and 5.0%(80/1605), respectively. The isolation rates of methicillin-resistant S.aureus(MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus(MRCNS) were 44.1%(940/2130) and 74.6%(381/511), respectively. No strains of Staphylococcus or Enterococcus that were resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin or linezolid were found. CONCLUSION The drug resistance of the isolated strains is increasingly serious. The isolation rate of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria continues to rise. It is necessary to reasonably use antibiotics, take effective measures and monitor the bacterial resistance so as to reduce the risk of nosocomial infection.
作者 刘萌 张浩军 李可可 张映华 杨亚红 崔亚丽 关晓雯 王雯婕 焦凤媛 魏莲花 LIU Meng;ZHANG Hao-jun;LI Ke-ke;ZHANG Ying-hua;YANG Ya-hong;CUI Ya-li;GUANXiao-wen;WANGWen-jie;JIAOFeng-yuan;WEI Lian-hua(Ning Xia Medical University,Yinchuan,Ningria 750004,China;不详)
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第9期1415-1420,共6页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81960385)。
关键词 细菌耐药性 耐药率 抗菌药物 多药耐药菌 Antibacterial resistance Drug resistance rate Antibiotic Multidrug-resistant organism
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献37

  • 1Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-first informational supplement. MI00-S22. Wayne, PA:CLSI,2012.
  • 2European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version I. I, 2010-04-27.
  • 3Jones RN, Ferraro MJ, Reller LB, et al. Multicenter studies of tigecycline disk diffusion susceptibility results for Acinetobacter spp.J Clin Microbiol,2007 ,45 :227-230.
  • 4Fernrindez-Mazarrasa C, Mazarrasa 0, CalvoJ, et al. High concerntration of mananese in Mueller-Hinton agar increase MICs of tigecyc:line determined by Etest.J Clin Microbiol, 2009, 47: 827-829.
  • 5Bradford PA, Petersen PJ, Young M, et al. Tigecycline MIC testing by broth dilution requires use of fresh medium or addition of the biocatalytic oxygen-reducing reagent oxyrase to standardize the test method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother ,2005,49 :3903-3909.
  • 6Curcio D, Fernandez F. Comment on: Effect of different Mueller?Hinton agars on tigecycline disc diffusion susceptibility for Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemother ,2008,62: 1166-1167.
  • 7Casal M, Rodriguez F,Johnson B, et al. Influence of testing methodology on the tigecycline activity profile against presumably tigecycline-nan-susceptible Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemather, 2009, 64:69-72.
  • 8Zarkotou 0, Pournaras S, Altouvas G, et al. Comparative evaluation of tigecycline susceptibility testing methods far expanded-spectrum cephalosporin and carbapenem-resistant gram?negative pathogens.J Clin Microbiol, 2012, 50 :3747-3750.
  • 9LiuJW, Ko WC, Huang CH, et al. Agreement assessment of tigecycline susceptibilities determined by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods among commonly encountered resistant bacterial isolates: results from the Tigecycline In Vitro Surveillance in Taiwan (TIST) study, 2008 to 2010. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2012, 56:1414-1417.
  • 10Huang TD, Berhin C, Bogaerts P, et al. In vitro susceptibility of multi drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates to tigecycline.J Antimicrob Chemother, 2012, 67 :2696-2699.

共引文献256

同被引文献61

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部