期刊文献+

提升工程2.0培训:PEPR评价监测指标及模型的构建——以吉林省提升工程2.0培训评价为例 被引量:2

Improvement Engineering 2.0 Training: PEPR Evaluation and Monitoring Indicators and Model Construction——Taking Jilin Province’s lifting project 2.0 training evaluation as an example
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 培训评价是教师培训的重要环节,对于培训具有很强的导向作用。当前,培训模型的构建和培训指标的确定多针对教师个体学习效果的评估,而对学校承担某一项目效果开展评估的研究成果较少,但对于提升工程2.0培训来说,“整校推进”是其培训的重要特征,因此构建“整校考核”的模型就显得尤为重要。本文结合吉林省提升工程2.0培训实践,阐述了PEPR培训指标体系确定的基本原则、指标体系的结构及其内涵,以及评价指标体系在提升工程2.0培训监测中的应用,为提升工程2.0培训监管模型的构建提供参考。 Training evaluation is an important part of teacher training and has a strong guiding role for training. At present, the construction of training models and the determination of training indicators are mostly based on the evaluation of the individual teacher’s learning effect, and there are fewer research results on the evaluation of the effect of a project undertaken by the school. It is an important feature of its training, so it is particularly important to build a model of "whole school assessment". Based on the practice of this province, this article elaborates the basic principles of PEPR training indicator system determination, the structure of the indicator system and its connotation, and the application of the evaluation indicator system in the monitoring of the training of 2.0 for the improvement project, and provides a reference for the construction of the supervision model of the training of the 2.0 project.
作者 郑世忠 ZHENG Shizhong
机构地区 吉林省教育学院
出处 《吉林省教育学院学报》 2022年第8期13-16,共4页 Journal of Jilin Provincial Institute of Education
关键词 提升工程2.0 培训评价 模型建构 lifting project 2.0 evaluation and monitoring model
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献44

  • 1李秀果.区域发展战略的内容及制订方法[J].科研管理,1988,9(2):16-21. 被引量:1
  • 2吴伟萍.城市信息化发展战略路径:基本理论分析框架[J].情报科学,2007,25(1):21-24. 被引量:5
  • 3Kirkpatrick,D(2008).Evaluating training programs:The fourlevels(3rd)[M].Berrett-Koehler Publishers,Inc.30.
  • 4Jack J.Phillips(2003).Return on Investment in Training andPerformance Improvement Programs(2rd)[M].Elsevier Sci-ence,32.
  • 5Holton,E.F.,III.(2005).Holton’s evaluation model:Newevidence and construct elaborations[J].Advances in Devel-oping Human Resources,7(01):51.
  • 6Dean R.Spitzer(2005).Learning effectiveness:A new ap-proach for measuring and managing learning to achievebusiness results[J].Advances in Developing Human Re-sources,60.
  • 7Brent W.Mattson(2005).Using the critical outcome tech-nique to demonstrate financial and organizational perfor-mance results[J].Advances in Developing Human Re-sources,104.
  • 8Swanson,R.A.Holton,E.F.,III.(1997)Human ResourceDevelopment Research Handbook:Linking Research andPractice[M].San Francisco:Berrett-Koehler,45.
  • 9Russ-Eft,D.,&Preskill,H.(2005).In search of the holygrail:Return on investment evaluation in human resourcedevelopment[J].Advances in Developing Human Resources,7(01):71-85.
  • 10Lynham,S.A.(2000).Theory building in the human resourcedevelopment profession.Human Resource DevelopmentQuarterly,11(02):159-178.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部