摘要
随着写作自动评价系统在二语/外语写作教学实践中的广泛应用,学者们对其评价信度一直褒贬不一。该研究以iWrite作文自动评分系统和2名大学英语四、六级考试作文评分员为研究工具,以北京某高校大学英语二年级经济管理专业的36篇作文为研究对象,对iWrite系统评分信度和评分员评分信度进行对比分析。研究发现,iWrite评分信度与人工评分信度没有显著性差异。因此,为充分发挥写作自动评价系统的辅助作用,iWrite系统反馈应与大学英语教学评价相结合;增加基于iWrite自动评分系统的写作实践,激发大学生的英语写作兴趣;开展学生间写作互评,提升大学生的自主学习能力。
Reliability is one of the key aspects in ESL/EFL essay scoring.This study examines the scoring effects of iWrite,an online Automated Writing Evaluation(AWE)system,and that of the tow composition scorers of CET4&6 in scoring 36 second-year college students'English compositions in a university of Beijing.The result of this study found that no significant difference is made between the reliability of iWrite scoring and that of the scorers of CET4&6 composition.To give full play to the auxiliary role of the AWE system,hence,the feedback of the iWrite should be combined with the evaluation of the English teaching of the university;To stimulate the writing interest of university students,an increase in writing practice based on the iWrite automatic scoring system be made;Activities of students'mutual evaluation of writing be carried out to enhance their self-learning ability.
出处
《高教学刊》
2022年第33期94-97,共4页
Journal of Higher Education
基金
黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目“Toulmin模式的中国英语学习者论证图式的认知诊断研究”(21YYB161)
黑龙江省本科高校首批外语教育改革创新项目“新工科背景下大学英语人文素养与语言技能相融合的泛在学习模式构建研究”(HWX2022004-A)
2022年度哈尔滨工程大学教改项目“‘人工智能’赋能拔尖创新型人才培养模式下大学英语教学体系重构与探索”(无编号)的阶段性成果。
