摘要
现有制造业高质量发展研究分散且呈现为碎片化态势,对其发展脉络、研究争鸣与盲区尚未给出清晰阐释。基于CNKI数据库,采用图谱量化方法分析中国制造业高质量发展的理论研究动态。研究发现:(1)对五大发展理念的认识、区域制造业高质量发展、产业融合高质量发展和高质量发展评价体系是中国制造业高质量发展的主干研究内容(研究脉络);(2)基于不同的时期和时代发展背景,学界研究的前沿问题总体上可以划分为四个阶段:从速度到质量的转变、供给侧结构性改革、创新驱动和新旧动能转换以及区域高质量发展(研究脉络演进历程);(3)学术争鸣主要集中在高质量发展内涵、五大发展理念、区域制造业高质量发展、产业融合高质量发展以及制造业高质量发展评价体系等方面(研究争鸣);(4)存在宏观、中观和微观三个维度的中国制造业高质量发展研究的9个盲区(盲区)。
The manufacturing industry is the foundation of the country and the lifeblood of the national economy.Promoting the high-quality development of manufacturing industry is the core content of China’s high-quality economic development and an important foundation for accelerating the construction of socialist modernization. However, the existing research on high-quality development of manufacturing industry is scattered and fragmented, and the research on the connotation of high-quality development of manufacturing industry, evaluation system and high-quality development of industrial integration is still in the initial stage, and many issues have not yet reached a consensus. Therefore, to further clarify the current situation, hot spots and trends of the academic research on the high-quality development of China’s manufacturing industry, and to gain insight into its evolution, research debates and existing blind spots, is an important issue that all walks of life should pay urgent attention to. The study takes high-quality development as the theme, takes the high-quality development literature retrieved from CNKI database as the research object, and adopts a combination of literature induction and bibliometric methods to discuss the theory of high-quality development of China’s manufacturing industry. First, the research data sources were sorted and summarized with the help of literature research method, and the theoretical pulse structure of high quality development was mapped. Secondly, the literature on high quality development of manufacturing industry is integrated and analyzed, and "CiteSpace" software is used to further analyze the research data sources econometrically and draw a thematic clustering map. Finally, after getting a panoramic view of the research related to the high quality theory of Chinese manufacturing industry through bibliometric analysis, the study summarize the theme clustering and core viewpoints of research schools, and explore the controversies and blind spots of the theoretical research on high quality development of Chinese manufacturing industry. The study found that:(1) Awareness of the five development concepts, high-quality development of regional manufacturing industries, high-quality development of industrial integration and high-quality development evaluation system are the main research contents of high-quality development of China’s manufacturing industries.(2) Based on the development background of different periods and times, the frontier issues of academic research can be generally divided into four stages: the shift from speed to quality, supply-side structural reform, innovation-driven and old-and new-energy conversion, and regional high-quality development.(3) To summarize the academic debates formed under the current issue of high-quality development of China’s manufacturing industry in terms of the focus of debates, category classification, classification basis, typical literature, trends and shortcomings, and comments, etc., and find that there are debates on which fields should be involved in the connotation of high-quality development, debates on the importance of innovation, coordination and green concepts among the five development concepts, debates on the method of regional classification of high-quality development of regional manufacturing industry, debates on the focus of integration between manufacturing and other industries in the high-quality development of industrial integration, and debates on the perspective of constructing the evaluation system of high-quality development of manufacturing industry.(4) On the basis of enterprise survey, the theory of high-quality development of China’s manufacturing industry is deductively reasoned, and the blind spots of the existing research are explained in detail in three dimensions: Macroscopic blind spots are not sufficiently considered how China’s manufacturing industry can achieve leadership in the international perspective, not sufficiently considered the social mobility of the population, etc. The blind spot in the meso dimension is the lack of research on the interaction between technological innovation and business model innovation in the context of servitization of manufacturing enterprises, the lack of research on cultural soft power, etc. The blind spot in the micro dimension is the lack of thinking about the reconstruction of the basic operation capability of manufacturing enterprises, the lack of research on the synergistic development between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, etc.
作者
李秋香
马草原
齐二石
黄毅敏
LI Qiuxiang;MA Caoyuan;QI Ershi;HUANG Yimin(Business School,Henan University,Kaifeng 475001,China;College of Management and Economy,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China;School of Management and Economics,North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power,Zhengzhou 450046,China)
出处
《科学学与科学技术管理》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2022年第9期125-145,共21页
Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(20FGLB050、19FGLB067)
河南省科技发展计划软科学项目(222400410075)。
关键词
高质量发展
制造业
研究动态
文献综述
high-quality development
manufacturing
research dynamics
literature review
