期刊文献+

不同场强MRI及CT对肩袖损伤诊断的对比研究 被引量:16

1.5T MRI, 3.0T MRI and MSCT in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Injury
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨1.5T磁共振成像(MRI)与3.0T MRI及多层螺旋CT(MSCT)在肩袖损伤中的临床诊断价值,为肩袖损伤患者的诊断提供指导。方法 选2019年10月到2021年10月于我院就诊疑似肩袖损伤患者(92例)为研究对象。所有研究对象均行1.5T MRI与3.0T MRI及MSCT检查,并以关节镜检查为金标准,探讨三种方法在在肩袖损伤中的临床诊断价值。结果 92例疑似肩袖损伤患者中,关节镜检查确诊74例。肩袖完全撕裂28例,肩袖部分撕裂22例,肩袖变性10例,肩袖撕裂合并盂唇损伤14例。2例疑似肩袖损伤患者中,1.5T MRI诊断:灵敏度为74.32%,特异性为50.00%,准确性64.57%,阳性预测值85.94%;3.0T MRI诊断:灵敏度为93.24%,特异性为88.89%,准确性92.39%,阳性预测值97.18%。MSCT诊断:灵敏度为54.05%,特异性为16.67%,准确性46.74%,阳性预测值72.23%。1.5T MRI及3.0T MRI灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值均高于MSCT,3.0T MRI灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值均高于1.5T MRI,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 1.5T MRI与3.0T MRI及MSCT均可为临床诊治肩袖损伤提供可靠的影像学依据,但与MSCT相比,1.5T MRI及3.0T MRI对肩袖损伤的临床诊断价值更高,与1.5T MRI相比,3.0T MRI对肩袖损伤的临床诊断价值更高。 Objective To explore the clinical diagnostic value of 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging(MRI), 3.0T MRI and multi-slice spiral CT(MSCT) in rotator cuff injury, and provide guidance for the diagnosis of rotator cuff injury patients. Methods Patients(92 cases) with suspected rotator cuff injury who visited our hospital from October 2019 to October 2021 were selected as the research objects. All subjects underwent 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI and MSCT examinations, and arthroscopy was used as the gold standard to explore the clinical diagnostic value of the three methods in rotator cuff injuries. Results Among 92 patients with suspected rotator cuff injury, 74 cases were confirmed by arthroscopy. There were 28 cases of complete rotator cuff tear, 22 cases of partial rotator cuff tear, 10 cases of rotator cuff degeneration, 14 cases of rotator cuff tear combined with labrum injury. In 2 patients with suspected rotator cuff injury, 1.5T MRI diagnosis: sensitivity was 74.32%, specificity was 50.00%, accuracy was 64.57%, positive predictive value was 85.94%;3.0T MRI diagnosis: sensitivity was 93.24%, specificity was 88.89 %, the accuracy is 92.39%, and the positive predictive value is 97.18%. MSCT diagnosis: sensitivity is 54.05%, specificity is 16.67%, accuracy is 46.74%, and positive predictive value is 72.23%. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value of 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI are higher than MSCT, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value of 3.0T MRI are higher than 1.5T MRI, and the differences are statistically significant.(P<0.05). Conclusion Both 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI and MSCT can provide reliable imaging evidence for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff injury. However, compared with MSCT, 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI have a higher clinical diagnostic value for rotator cuff injury. Compared with T MRI, 3.0T MRI has a higher clinical diagnostic value for rotator cuff injury.
作者 彭杰 王良勇 马静 王启伟 PENG Jie;WANG Liang-yong;MA Jing;WANG Qi-wei(Image Center of the First Division Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps,Xinjiang 843000,China;Orthopedic Department of the First Division Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps,Xinjiang 843000,China;Image Center of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps General Hospital,Xinjiang 830000,China;Physical examination in the First Division Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Ministry,Xinjiang 843000,China)
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2023年第1期158-160,共3页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
基金 南疆重点产业创新发展支撑计划(2021DB022)。
关键词 1.5T MRI 3.0T MRI MSCT 肩袖损伤 诊断价值 1.5T MRI 3.0T MRI MSCT Rotator Cuff Injury Diagnostic Value
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献129

  • 1张一翀,陈建海.肩袖疾病的治疗:ISAKOS上肢专业委员会专家共识[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2014,2(2):128-135. 被引量:8
  • 2潘玉萍,李明华,宋国平,乔瑞华.MRI在肩关节外伤中的应用价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2004,15(11):633-635. 被引量:5
  • 3姜春岩,冯华,洪雷,朱以明,王满宜,荣国威.肩袖损伤的关节镜下治疗[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(4):249-253. 被引量:72
  • 4冉北航,张芬,尹文芳.羽毛球运动中发生手腕和肩袖损伤的相关因素调查[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(44):41-43. 被引量:14
  • 5王德杭.肩关节MRl影像解剖与软组织损伤[c].第六届医学影像山东国际论坛山东省第十八次放射学学术会议暨山东省第十六届医学影像学学术研讨会论文集.2009:59-60.
  • 6王德利.肩关节MRA在肩关节外科治疗中的临床价值[C].第十一届全军骨科学术大会论文集.2010:463-464.
  • 7Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, et al. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994, (304) :78 - 83.
  • 8Rousseau T, Roussignol X, Bertiaux S, et al. Arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears using the side-to-side suture technique. Mid-term clinical and anatomic evaluation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2012,98 (4) :S1 - $8.
  • 9DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg, 1984,66 (4) : 563 - 567.
  • 10Herrmann S J, Izadpanah K, Sudkamp NP, et al. Tears of the rotator cuff. Causes-diagnosis-treatment. Aeta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2014,81 (4) :256 - 266.

共引文献283

同被引文献162

引证文献16

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部