期刊文献+

化妆品保湿功效消费者使用测试中的定量问卷信效度比较

Comparison of reliability and validity of quantitative questionnaires in consumer use test of cosmetic moisturizing efficacy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 拟通过在同一测试流程中使用消费者测试和客观仪器测量方法,当不同测量方法所获得的保湿功效结果一致时,比对消费者使用测试中5分制和9分制定量问卷在化妆品保湿功效测试中的信效度。结果表明,5分制和9分制定量问卷在评价保湿功效上信效度均良好,但相比之下,9分制定量问卷有2个优势:结果上有所不同,9分制定量问卷的结果与客观仪器的结果更接近;9分制定量问卷信效度优于5分制定量问卷,该研究为今后消费者使用测试验证化妆品保湿功效的问卷设计提供了思路。 Both consumer tests and objective instrument measurement were used in the same testing process for evaluating the moisturizing efficacy of cosmetics.When the results of these different methods were consistent,the reliability and validity were compared between 5-point and 9-point quantitative questionnaires in consumer use test.The results showed that,both 5-point and 9-point quantitative questionnaires had good reliability and validity in the evaluation of moisturizing efficacy.But in contrast,the 9-point quantitative questionnaire had two advantages.First,the results were different,and the results of the 9-point quantitative questionnaire were closer to those obtained from objective instrument.Second,the reliability and validity of the 9-point quantitative questionnaire was better than that of the 5-point quantitative questionnaire.This work could provide an idea for the design of questionnaires in consumer use test of cosmetic moisturizing efficacy in future.
作者 朴彦锟 袁静 郑琳 孙华 PIAO Yan-kun;YUAN Jing;ZHENG Lin;SUN Hua(Shanghai China-norm Quality Technology Service Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200040,China)
出处 《日用化学品科学》 CAS 2023年第2期32-38,共7页 Detergent & Cosmetics
关键词 化妆品 保湿功效 消费者使用测试 定量问卷 信效度 cosmetics moisturizing effect consumer use test quantitative questionnaire reliability and validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部