摘要
个人信息与隐私信息的界限由混同走向清晰,其定义模式也从“识别说”发展到“关联说”。判断信息的可识别性有三项标准:在识别主体上,应采“主观说”,以实现个人信息保护与侵权责任构成要件的衔接;在识别对象上,需将“识别”限缩解释为“身份识别”,且完成身份识别至少需要两个以上的标识符,并至少包含一个社会意义上的标识符;在识别方式上,直接识别方式的存在与否有待商榷,以人格利益的关联性作为间接识别中个人信息的判断标准,可避免个人信息的外延失之过泛。
The boundary between personal information and private information has changed from being mixed to being clear, and its definition mode has also developed from “identification theory” to “association theory”. There are three criteria for judging the identifiability of information, i.e. the identification subject should adopt the “subjective theory” to realize the connection between personal information protection and the constituent elements of tort liability. On the identification object, the “identification” limit needs to be interpreted as “identity recognition”, at least two or more identifiers are required to complete the identification, and at least one identifier in the social sense is required. In terms of identification methods, the existence of direct identification methods is debatable, and taking the correlation of personality interests as the criterion for judging personal information in indirect identification can avoid excessive extension of personal information.
作者
刘宗胜
张毅
LIU Zong-sheng;ZHANG Yi(School of Credit Risk Management,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,China)
出处
《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第1期100-108,共9页
Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
个人信息
身份识别
行为识别
直接识别
间接识别
personal information
identity recognition
behavior recognition
direct identification
indirect identification
