期刊文献+

完全植入式输液港植入术后导管头端异位介入复位6例 被引量:2

Interventional restoration for malposition of catheter tip after the placement of totally implantable access port: preliminary results in 6 cases
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨完全植入式输液港(TIAP)植入术后导管头端异位的原因、确诊方法及处理措施。方法 回顾性分析2016年3月至2021年12月在江阴市人民医院接受TIAP植入术的2 234例患者临床资料。记录术后导管头端异位发生率、发生时间,分析原因,评价处理措施。结果 2 234例患者均成功植入TIAP。6例(0.27%)术后发生导管头端异位,均经影像学检查证实。6例中男4例,女2例,年龄(61.5±18.2)岁,26~79岁。TIAP植入至发现导管头端异位时间为18~119 d,主要原因为导管位置过浅、剧烈咳嗽、肢体活动和肥胖。采用介入猪尾导管勾挂法,6例导管头端异位均获成功复位。1例复位后再次异位,后取出TIAP并经锁骨上入路穿刺锁骨下静脉重新植入TIAP,未再出现异位。结论 TIAP植入术后导管头端异位发生率低,易于确诊和复位。介入猪尾导管勾挂法复位简便、安全,但仍需警惕因导管头端异位所导致的不良后果。 Objective To discuss the causes,diagnosis and treatment measures of catheter tip malposition after the placement of totally implantable access port(TIAP).Methods The clinical data of a total of 2234 patients,who underwent TIAP placement at the Jiangyin Municipal People's Hospital of China between March 2016 and December 2021,were retrospectively analyzed.The incidence of post-TIAP catheter tip malposition and the time of its occurrence were recorded,the causes were analyzed,and the treatment measures were evaluated.Results Successful implantation of TIAP was accomplished in all the 2234 patients.Post-TIAP catheter tip malposition,which was confirmed by imaging examination,occurred in 6 patients(0.27%),including 4 males and 2 females with a mean age of(61.5±18.2)years(range of 26-79 years).The interval from TIAP implantation to the discovery of catheter tip malposition was within 18-119 days.The main causes of catheter tip malposition included too shallow insertion of catheter into superior vena cava,severe coughing,vigorous limb movement and obesity.By using pigtail catheter hook technique,successful restoration of catheter tip malposition was achieved in all 6 patients.Recurrence of catheter tip malposition occurred in one patient,the implanted TIAP had to be removed and re-implantation of TIAP through subclavian vein puncture via supraclavicular approach was carried out,and thereafter the catheter tip malposition didn't occur again.Conclusion Clinically,the incidence of post-TIAP catheter tip malposition is very low,and this disorder is easily to be diagnosed and restored.The interventional pigtail catheter hook method is technically simple and clinically safe.However,high attention should be paid to the adverse consequences caused by catheter tip malposition.
作者 潘天帆 高峰 任冬青 郭新春 黄祥忠 PAN Tianfan;GAO Feng;REN Dongqing;GUO Xinchun;HUANG Xiangzhong(Department of Interventional Radiology,Jiangyin Municipal People’s Hospital,Jiangyin,Jiangsu Province 214400,China)
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第3期251-254,共4页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
关键词 完全植入式输液港 异位 猪尾导管 复位 totally implantable access port malposition pigtail catheter restoration
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献56

  • 1许秀芳,李晓蓉,刘玉金.肿瘤介入护理学[M].北京:科学出版社,2011:32.
  • 2程永德,程英升,颜志平,等.常见恶性肿瘤介入治疗指南[M].北京:科学出版社,2013年.
  • 3Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, et al. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment[J]. Surgery, 1982, 92: 706-712.
  • 4Kreis H, Loehberg CR, Lux MP, et al. Patients' attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignancies[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2007, 33: 39-43.
  • 5Ignatov A, Hoffman O, Smith B, et al. An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: com- plications and patient satisfaction [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2009, 35:241-246.
  • 6Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer MR. Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access: a systematic review[J]. Crit Care Med, 2002, 30: 454-460.
  • 7Lorente L, Henry C, Martin MM, et al. Central venous catheter- related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters[J]. Crit Care, 2005, 9: R631-R635.
  • 8American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access, Rupp SM, Apfelbaum JL, et al. Practice guidelines for central venous access: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access [ J]. Anesthesiology, 2012, 116: 559-573.
  • 9Biffi R, Orsi F, Pozzi S, et al. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial[J]. Ann Oncol, 2009, 20: 935-940.
  • 10Marik PE, Flemmer M, Harrison W. The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2012, 40: 2479-2485.

共引文献223

同被引文献31

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部