摘要
当今“唯论文”现象不仅存在于高校教师晋升和评价中,而且广泛扩散到高等教育的方方面面。“唯论文”现象的出现有其客观因素和必然性,具有相当的复杂性。其形成原因主要在于论文的可比性强、排行榜更侧重论文以及学科发文量排名的诱导。破解“唯论文”的顽瘴痼疾会遇到同行评议与公平客观的两难、多元多样与简便易行的两难、行政权力与排行自由的两难。破解或缓解“唯论文”,应大力推行代表作制度、采用同行评价制度,同时需采取保障客观评审的办法,如增加同行评价专家、采用匿名评审、建立送审平台等,并降低对师生发表高水平期刊论文的数量要求。只有破除“唯论文”,中国学术界才可能改变追求论文数量的状况,真正做到以质量取胜,从而使中国由“论文生产大国”跃升为“高等教育强国”。
The current phenomenon of only-papers not only exists in the promotion and evaluation of university teachers but also widely spreads to all aspects of higher education.The emergence of the only-papers phenomenon has its objective factors and certainty and is quite complex.Its formation is mainly due to the papers'comparability characteristics,the ranking list's incentive to emphasize the papers,and the induction of ranking the number of published papers.The solution to the persistent problem of only-papers will encounter the dilemma of peer review and fairness,diversity and simplicity,administrative power and ranking freedom.The primary way to crack or alleviate the problem of only-papers is to implement a representative work system and adopt a peer evaluation system.At the same time,measures such as increasing the evaluation peers,using anonymous evaluations,and establishing review platforms need to be adopted to ensure objective evaluation,Furthermore,we should reduce the requirement of numbers for teachers and students to publish papers in CSSCI-indexed journals.Only by eliminating the concept of only-papers can it change the interest of the Chinese academic community from paper quantity to paper quality,thus elevating China from a paper-producing country to a higher education powerhouse.
出处
《大学教育科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第3期4-12,共9页
University Education Science
基金
国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2020年度教育学一般课题“大学生参与高校教师发展的理论与实践研究”(BAA200021)。
关键词
“唯论文”
破“五唯”
教师评价
代表作制度
同行评价
only-paper
break the five-only
teacher evaluation
representative work system
peer evaluation
