期刊文献+

强制与克制:拜登政府台海政策中的对冲逻辑

Coercion and Restraint:The Hedging Logic in the Biden Administration's China Taiwan Policy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 拜登政府的台海政策兼有战略强制和战略克制的成分,存在一种对冲逻辑。这种逻辑是基于其对于“台海现状”和被中国台湾当局“牵连”的双重认知。根据强制和克制的概念以及上述双重认知,可以构建对冲逻辑分析框架来解释拜登政府的台海政策。对冲逻辑可细分为四种类型,结合对应的四种情况进行推理分析后发现,拜登政府在台海的对冲逻辑体现了美国外交中的机会主义和实用主义。这一逻辑服务于美国对华遏制的大战略,可能给台海和平稳定带来巨大风险。 The Biden administration's China Taiwan Policy combines elements of strategic coercion and strategic restraint,exhibiting a hedging logic.This logic is based on its dual perception of the“status quo of the Taiwan Straits situation”and the U.S.being“entangled”in the Taiwan region.By employing the concepts of coercion and restraint,as well as analyzing the“dual perception”,this paper aims to construct an analytical framework to explain the hedging logic in the Biden administration's China Taiwan Policy regarding the Chinese mainland.It subdivides the hedging logic into four types and then analyzes each corresponding situation.In the end,the paper concludes that the Biden administration's hedging logic in the Taiwan Straits embodies opportunism and pragmatism in U.S.diplomacy.This logic serves the grand strategy of containing China and may pose significant risks to peace and stability in the Taiwan Straits.
作者 夏昂 孙云 Xia Ang;Sun Yun
出处 《台湾研究集刊》 CSSCI 2023年第3期34-45,共12页 Taiwan Research Journal
基金 教育部高校国别和区域研究2021年度规划课题“拜登政府台海政策‘再模糊化’研究”(2021-G13)。
关键词 拜登政府 台海 强制 克制 对冲 the Biden administration China Taiwan Policy coercion restraint hedging
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1Ken Booth. The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics[M]. London:Macmillan Press, 2008.
  • 2Robert Jervis. Perception and Misperception in International Politics[M]. Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 3Evans Medeiros.Strategic Hedging and Future of Asia- Pacific Stability[J].The Washington Quarterly,2006, 29 (1).
  • 4Brock Tessman. Great Powers and Strategic Hedging[J]. International Studies l~eview, 2011, (13).
  • 5Eosemary Foot. Chinese Strategies in a U.S.- Hegemonic Global Order: Accommodating and Hedging [J] International Affairs, 2006, 82 (1).
  • 6Ren&to Cruz De C&str. Eng&ging both the Eagle and Dragon:The Philippines, Precarious and Futile Attempt in Equi-b&lancing [J] . Pacific Focus, 2010, 25(3).
  • 7John Ciorciari.The Balance of Great-Power Influence in Contemporary Southeast Asia[J]. International Relations of Asia-Pacific, 2009, (9).
  • 8Renato Cruz De Castro. The US-Philippine Alliance an Evolving Hedge against Emerging China Challenge [J]. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2009, 31(3).
  • 9Rommel C.Banlaoi. Philippines-China Security P, etations: Current Issues and Emerging Concerns[M].Yuchengco Center De La Salle Uniuersity Manila, 2012,20.
  • 10Evelyn Goh. Meeting the China Challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian R, egional Security Strategies[M].American East-West Center, 2005.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部