摘要
[目的/意义]新型研究型大学的国际开放能力及影响力指数,是指导我国高校建设有国际影响力的高水平研究型大学和构建科学、全面、与国际接轨的多元化评估机制的重要议题。[方法/过程]依据新型研究型大学建设的时代背景及其重要特征,从国际开放能力及国际影响力维度构建评价指数,设置了科研对外引领力、办学对外开放力和国际社会引导力3个一级指标;科研影响力、平台影响力、社会引领力、教学影响力、教师影响力、学生影响力、国际传播与服务、国际交流与合作共8个二级指标;CNCI、高被引论文百分比、H指数、国际教学与科研平台数等21个三级指标。在权重确定方法上,使用主观赋权的网络分析法ANP与客观赋权的CRITIC赋权法相结合,构建了新型研究型大学国际开放能力及影响力指数。结合36所“双一流”建设A类高校的公开数据进行实证分析,获得我国高校国际开放能力及影响力排名。[结果/结论]研究结果表明,36所高校一级指标得分分布呈现“反J型”分布,表明我国顶尖高校带动力强但数量较少,大部分研究型高校国际化进程与路径相似,并从科研对外引领力、办学对外开放力和国际社会引导力3个方面提出相应的建设策略。
[Purpose/Significance]The new research universities international openness and influence index is an important topic to guide the construction of high-level research universities with international influence and the establishment of a scientific,comprehensive,and international diversified evaluation mechanism.[Method/Process]According to the background and important characteristics of the construction of new research universities,from the dimensions of international openness and international influence,the index set three first-level indicators of Global Leadership of Scientific Research(GLSR),International Openness of Education(IOE),and Global Leadership of Society(GLS).There were 8 second-level indicators including Influence of Scientific Research(ISR),Influence of Platform(IOP),Social Leadership Force(SIF),Influence of Teaching(IOT),Influence of Faculty(IOF),Influence of Student(IOS),International Communication and Services(ICS),and International Exchange and Cooperation(IEC).21 third-level indicators such as CNCI,percentage of highly cited papers,h index,number of international teaching and research platforms,etc.In terms of the weight determination method,the subjective weighting method ANP was combined with the objective weighting method CRITIC to construct a new type of research university international openness and influence index.Combined with the public data of 36“Double First-Class”A-level universities for empirical analysis,Chinese universities international openness and influence rankings were obtained.[Result/Conclusion]The research results show that the score distribution of the first-level indicators of 36 universities presents an“inverse J-shaped”,indicating that top universities have strong driving forces but a small number.Most research universities have similar internationalization processes and paths.In the end,this study proposes corresponding construction strategies from global leadership of scientific research,international openness of education,and global leadership of society.
作者
王晰巍
罗然
乌吉斯古楞
Wang Xiwei;Luo Ran;Wuji Siguleng(School of Business and Management,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China;Social Science Research Institute,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China;Research Center for Big Data Management,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China;Research Center of Cyberspace Governance,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China)
出处
《现代情报》
CSSCI
2023年第9期137-153,共17页
Journal of Modern Information
基金
科学计量学联合实验室开放基金“新型研究型大学国际开放能力和全球影响力实证研究”(项目编号:IT2147)。
关键词
新型研究型大学
国际开放能力
国际影响力
指数
new research university
international openness
international influence
index
