摘要
英国哲学家摩尔以“自然主义谬误”对西方主流道德理论的知识合法性发起挑战。然而,摩尔所开启的元伦理学不仅没有实现科学伦理学的目标,反而引发学界对伦理知识本身是否存在的质疑,以及伦理学研究的理论与反理论之争。近年来,承诺伦理知识存在并反对道德理论化的学者认为,伦理知识作为一种实践知识,在内涵上不仅聚焦于行为选择的薄的道德,还应包括人的幸福和自我发展等厚的伦理。重释儒家伦理学中“学以成人”的工夫论和强调“体知”的道德认识论,从中可以发展出一种有效回应摩尔问题的伦理知识进路。
The British philosopher Moore challenged the intellectual legitimacy of western mainstream moral theory with the"Naturalistic fallacy".However,the Metaethics initiated by Moore not only failed to achieve the goal of scientific ethics,but also caused the academic circles to put into question the existence of ethical knowledge itself,provoking the controversy between the theory and anti-theory of ethical research.Over recent years,scholars who promise the existence of ethical knowledge and oppose moral theorization believe that ethical knowledge,as a practical knowledge,should not only focus on the thin morality of behavioral choices,They argue that it should also include thick ethics such as human happiness and self-development.Through the reinterpretation of the Confucian ethics'theory of"Learning to be Human"and the emphasis on the moral epistemology of"Embodied knowledge",we can develop an effective approach to ethical knowledge that responds to the Moore problem.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第8期29-35,78,共8页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“伦理学知识体系的当代中国重建”(项目编号:19ZDA033)的阶段性成果。
关键词
伦理学
知识论
伦理知识
合法性
Ethics
Epistemology
Ethical Knowledge
Legitimacy
