摘要
发展可再生能源已成为世界各国维护国家能源安全与应对气候变化的重要举措,一些企业也纷纷投资布局。在国际投资仲裁语境下,欧盟范围内以西班牙、意大利为代表的国家由于系列补贴制度的调整深陷泥淖。投资仲裁庭在审查公平公正待遇条款中“投资者合理期待”核心要素时的不一致,导致投资者诉求与东道国管制权难以平衡。将该问题置于“双碳”目标与气候变化议题视角下,重新梳理晚近可再生能源投资仲裁中仲裁庭的裁判逻辑与说理具有现实意义。我国应统筹推进可再生能源在国内治理层面与国际治理层面的良性互动。我国可再生能源领域投资者应从相关案件中吸取经验,相机决断;作为可再生能源投资东道国,我国应积极建立并完善合理的政策动态调整机制与有序的补贴退出机制。
In the background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals,countries in the world have taken the development of renewable energy as vital measures to maintain national energy security and to cope with climate change.Forward-looking enterprises have also make investments in international energy industries.In the context of international investment arbitration,countries represented by Spain,Italy within the EU are mired in troubles due to the adjustment of their subsidy systems.The inconsistencies of the investment tribunal in examining the core elements of“legitimate expectation of investors”in fair and equitable treatment clause result in difficult balance between demands of investors and regulatory rights of host states.It is of practical significance to re-examine and sort out the logic and reasoning of the arbitral tribunal in recent renewable energy investment arbitration practices from the perspective of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals as well as climate change issue.China should coordinate and promote positive interaction of renewable energy on both domestic and international governance level.Chinese investors invest abroad should draw lessons from these arbitration cases and make decisions cautiously.As the host state of accepting renewable energy investments,China should establish and continue to rationalize its policy frameworks,adjustment mechanisms as well as the subsidy withdrawal mechanisms.
作者
梁丹妮
唐浩森
LIANG Danni;TANG Haosen
出处
《武大国际法评论》
CSSCI
2023年第4期119-140,共22页
Wuhan University International Law Review
基金
国家社科基金项目“RCEP投资争端解决机制构建研究”(21BFX153)的阶段性成果之一。
关键词
双碳目标
可再生能源
国际投资仲裁
投资者合理期待
carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goal
renewable energy
international investment arbitration
legitimate expectation of investors
