期刊文献+

中国市售食品接触硅胶制品的细胞毒性评价

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Food Contact Silicone Products Marketed in China
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 为了研究不同细胞毒性测试方法之间的差别,本研究利用不同体外细胞毒性评价测试体系下的食品接触硅胶制品(Food Contact Silicone Products, FCSPs)的整体安全性进行研究。方法 样品在体积分数为95%的乙醇中模拟迁移(70℃保持2 h)后,通过系统优化实验条件,发展了FCSPs迁移液的细胞毒性评价方法。利用HeLa(子宫颈癌细胞)-NRU、HeLa-CCK-8(Cell CountingKit-8,CCK-8)、HepG2(Human Hepatoblastoma)-NRU、HepG2-CCK-8共4种测试体系对中国市售的19种FCSPs进行了细胞毒性评价。结果 样品在不同测试体系下的细胞毒性结果不同,其中65%的样品呈现中度毒性。结论 FCSPs的整体生物安全性亟须关注并深入研究。本研究为食品接触材料的体外生物测定提供了研究思路和科学依据。 The work aims to study the overall safety of food contact silicone products(FCSPs)by different in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation and test systems to study the difference of different in vitro cytotoxicity test methods.After the samples were simulated in 95%ethanol at 70℃for 2 h,the cytotoxicity evaluation method of FCSPs migration was de-veloped by systematically optimizing the experimental conditions.Four test systems including HeLa-NRU,HeLa-CCK-8,HepG2-NRU and HepG2-CCK-8 were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of 19 FCSPs marketed in China.The samples showed different cytotoxicity results under different testing systems.Among them,65%of the samples showed moderate cytotoxicity.The overall biological safety of FCSPs needs urgent attention and in-depth study.This study provides re-search ideas and scientific basis for the in vitro bioassay of food contact materials.
作者 郭一凡 张京伟 范晓洁 王文娟 封棣 GUO Yi-fan;ZHANG Jing-wei;FAN Xiao-jie;WANG Wen-juan;FENG Di(School of Light Industry,Beijing Technology and Business University,Beijing 100048,China)
出处 《包装工程》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第19期42-49,共8页 Packaging Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(31871722)。
关键词 食品接触硅胶制品 模拟迁移 细胞毒性 food contact silicone products simulated migration cytotoxicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献91

  • 1杨振宇,杨克成,黄俊.ICP-MS法快速测定食品容器浸出元素[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2005,15(12):1454-1456. 被引量:16
  • 2王征,张天宝,朱玉平,谢宗华.急性毒性体外筛选方法的比较[J].卫生研究,2006,35(3):286-288. 被引量:4
  • 3纪峰,崔崇威,李圭白,姜旭,罗文斌,朱灵敏,贾丽莉,慕先锋.液相色谱法测定水中痕量N,N-二甲基苯胺[J].中国给水排水,2007,23(12):76-79. 被引量:4
  • 4ONO-OGASAWARA M, SMITH T J. Diesel exhaust particles in the work environment and their analysis [ J ]. Ind Health, 2004, 42(4) : 389-399.
  • 5WHEATLEY A D, SADHRA S. Occupational exposure to diesel exhaust fumes[ J]. Ann Oeeup Hyg, 2004, 48 (4) : 369-376.
  • 6BORENFREUND E, BABICH H, MARTIN-ALGUACIL N. Comparisons of two in vitro cytotoxieity assays-The neutral red (NR) and tetrazolium MTT tests [ J ]. Toxieol in Vitro, 1988, 2(1): 1-6.
  • 7EKWALL B. Overview of the final ME1C results: ii. the in vitro:in vivo evaluation, including the selection of a practical battery of cell tests for prediction of acute lethal blood concentrations in humans [ J ]. Toxieol in Vitro, 1999, 13(4-5): 665-673.
  • 8FOTAKIS G, TIMBRELL J A. In vitro cytotoxicity assays: comparison of LDH, neutral red, MTT and protein assay in hepatoma cell lines following exposure to cadmium chloride [J]. Toxicol Lett, 2006, 160(2) : 171-177.
  • 9PUTNAM K P, BOMBICK D W, DOOLITTLE D J. Evaluation of eight in vitro assays for assessing the cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate [ J ]. Toxicol In Vitro, 2002, 16(5) : 599-607.
  • 10WEYERMANN J, LOCHMANN D, ZIMMER A. A practical note on the use of cytotoxicity assays[ J]. Int J Pharm, 2005, 288(2): 369-376.

共引文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部