期刊文献+

复苏时家属在场“风险-收益”与自信度量表的汉化和信效度检验 被引量:1

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of Perceptions of the Self⁃Confidence Scale and the Benefits and Risks of Family Presence During Resuscitation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:引进、汉化复苏时家属在场“风险-收益”与自信度量表,并对其进行跨文化调试及信效度检验。方法:获取原量表作者授权,遵循Brislin量表翻译原则,对该量表进行正向翻译、综合、回译和文化调适,形成中文版复苏时家属在场“风险-收益”与自信度量表。2022年7月—10月采用目的抽样法对394名医护人员进行调查,评价中文版量表的信效度。结果:形成的中文版量表由复苏时家属在场“风险-收益”分量表和自信度分量表组成,共38个条目。家属在场“风险-收益”分量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.840,重测信度为0.891;家属在场自信度分量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.970,重测信度为0.951。经探索性因子分析,“风险-收益”分量表提取4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为69.708%;自信度分量表提取2个公因子,累计方差贡献率为75.401%。结论:中文版复苏时家属在场“风险-收益”与自信度量表具有较好的信效度,可以用于测量医护人员对复苏时家属在场“风险-收益”感知以及实施自信度。 Objective:To develop the Chinese version of Perceptions of the Self-Confidence Scale and the Benefits and Risks of Family Presence During Resuscitation and examine its reliability and validity.Methods:Obtaining authorization from the author of the original scale and following the Brislin scale translation principle,the original scale was translated by the methods of translation,synthesis,back translation and cultural adjustment,and then the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Perceptions of the Self-Confidence Scale and the Benefits and Risks of Family Presence During Resuscitation were tested through a survey of 394 medical staff by purposive sampling from July 2022 to October 2022.Results:The Chinese version of the scale consisted of the"risk-benefit"subscale and the confidence subscale in the presence of family members,with a total of 38 items.The Cronbach'sαcoefficient of the"risk-benefit"subscale was 0.840,and the test-retest reliability was 0.891.The Cronbach'sαcoefficient of the family presence confidence subscale was 0.970,and the test-retest reliability was 0.951.Through exploratory factor analysis,four common factors were extracted from the"risk-benefit"subscale,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 69.708%.Two common factors were extracted from the confidence subscale,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 75.401%.Conclusion:The constructed Chinese version of Perceptions of the Self-Confidence Scale and the Benefits and Risks of Family Presence During Resuscitation has high validity and reliability,which can be used to measure the perceived"risk-benefit"and implementation confidence of medical staff on the presence of family members during resuscitation.
作者 过丽珍 孙青 廖晓琴 李晶晶 GUO Lizhen;SUN Qing;LIAO Xiaoqin;LI Jingjing(Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203 China;不详)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2023年第21期3826-3831,共6页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院“四明临床研究专项”项目,编号:SGKJLC-202011 上海中医药大学“杏林学者-护理青年”人才计划项目,编号:2022HLXL01。
关键词 心肺复苏 家属在场 风险-收益 自信度 信度 效度 resuscitation family presence risk‐benefit self‐confidence reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献65

  • 1赵亦欣,冯晨秋,娄凤兰.社区老年慢性疼痛患者自我效能状况及影响因素[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(2):466-468. 被引量:29
  • 2任海,王凯珍,肖淑红,赵书祥,陈国强.论体育资源配置模式——社会经济条件变革下的中国体育改革(一)[J].天津体育学院学报,2001,16(2):1-5. 被引量:185
  • 3Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 4Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 5Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 6Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 7Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 8Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 9Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 10Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.

共引文献1435

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部