期刊文献+

超声引导关节腔注射自体富白细胞血小板血浆与透明质酸钠治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效比较 被引量:1

Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of autologous leukocyte and platelet-rich plasma or sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较超声引导下关节腔注射自体富白细胞血小板血浆(PRP)与透明质酸钠(HA)治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)临床疗效。方法收集2020年2月1日至2022年2月1日在福建医科大学附属第一医院疼痛科门诊收治的56例K-L分级Ⅰ~Ⅲ级KOA患者。其中, PRP组30例, 采用超声引导关节腔内注射PRP治疗;HA组26例, 采用超声引导关节腔内注射HA治疗。两组患者每次注射3.5 ml PRP或HA, 间隔2周, 一共注射3次, 于治疗后1、3、6个月采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及Lysholm膝关节评分量表对患者的临床疗效进行评价。结果两组患者在治疗过程中均未见严重并发症, 治疗后1、3、6个月时, VAS评分均较治疗前改善, 差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05), 治疗后1、3个月时, 两组间VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。治疗后6个月时, PRP组的VAS评分及Lysholm膝关节评分量表总分均优于HA组[(2.3±1.2)比(3.2±1.4), (75.8±9.8)比(59.0±7.6), P均<0.05]。治疗后6个月时, PRP组优效率、总有效率均较HA组高[33.3%(10/30例)比7.7%(2/26例), χ^(2)=5.44, P=0.020;90.0%(27/30例)比38.5%(10/26例), χ^(2)=16.50, P<0.001]。结论超声引导PRP注射治疗KOA患者具有确切的临床疗效, 持久性方面优于HA注射。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of autologous leukocyte and platelet-rich plasma(PRP)or sodium hyaluronate(HA)in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Methods From February 1,2020 to February 1,2022,56 patients with Keligren Lawrence gradeⅠ-ⅢKOA were collected in the Department of Painology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University.With ultrasound-guided,30 patients received 3.5 ml PRP intra-articular injection in PRP group,and 26 patients received 3.5 ml HA intra-articular injection in HA group,every 2 weeks for a total of 3 times.Visual analogue score(VAS)and Lysholm knee joint score were evaluated at 1 month,3 months and 6 months after the treatment.Results No serious complications were found in the two groups during the treatment.At 1 month,3 months and 6 months after the treatment,VAS was improved(all P<0.05).VAS had no significant difference in the two groups at 1 month and 3 months after the treatment.But at 6 months after the treatment,VAS and the total score of Lysholm knee joint in the PRP group were significantly better than those in the HA group[(2.3±1.2)vs.(3.2±1.4),(75.8±9.8)vs.(59.0±7.6),all P<0.05].At 6 months after treatment,the efficiency rate and total effective rate in PRP group were higher than those in HA group[33.3%(10/30 cases)vs.7.7%(2/26 cases),χ^(2)=5.44,P=0.020;90.0%(27/30 cases)vs.38.5%(10/26 cases),χ^(2)=16.50,P<0.001].Conclusion Ultrasound-guided PRP injection has a positive clinical effect in the treatment of KOA,and is better than HA injection in the long term effects.
作者 何龙 江昊 林鹏 陈嘉芳 林章雅 He Long;Jiang Hao;Lin Peng;Chen Jiafang;Lin Zhangya(Department of Painology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University,National Regional Medical Center,Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou City,Fujian Province 350000,China)
出处 《中华疼痛学杂志》 2023年第5期752-757,共6页 Chinese Journal Of Painology
关键词 骨关节炎 富含血小板的血浆 透明质酸 Osteoarthritis,knee Platelet-rich plasma Hyaluronic acid
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献60

  • 1余卫,徐苓,秦明伟,Yu-qing Zhang,Michael C.Nevitt,Piran Aliabadi,Li-Yung Lui,David T.Felson.北京市城区老年人膝关节骨关节炎流行病学调查——与美国白种人膝关节骨关节炎的临床和X线比较分析[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(1):67-71. 被引量:94
  • 2Gobbi A, Lad D, Karnatzikos G. The effects of repeated intra- articular PRP injections on clinical outcomes of early osteoarthritis of the knee[J]. Knee Snrg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 23 (8) :2170-2177. DOI:I0. 1007/s00167-014-2987-4.
  • 3Filardo G, Kon E, Buda R, et al. Platelet-rich plasma intra- articular knee injections for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis [ J]. Knee Surg Sports Tranmatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19 (4):528-535. DOI:10. 1007/s00167-010-123845.
  • 4Kon E, Buda R, Filardo G, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: intra- articular knee injections produced favorable results on degenerative cartilage lesions [ J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18 (4) :472-479. DOI : 10. 1007/s00167-009-0940-8.
  • 5Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD, et al. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part II. Osteoarthritis of the knee. American College of Rheumatology [ J ]. Arthritis Rheum, 1995, 38 ( 11 ) : 1541-1546.
  • 6Kell~'en JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis[ J ]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1957, 16(4):494-502.
  • 7Alizai H, Virayavanich W, Joseph GB, et al. Cartilage lesion score : comparison of a quantitative assessment score with established semiquantitative MR scoring systems [J].Radiology, 2014, 271 (2) :479-487. DOI : 10.1148/radiol. 13122056.
  • 8Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee [ J]. JRheumatol, 1988, 15 ( 12 ) : 1833-1840.
  • 9Kooistra BW, Spraque S, Bhandari M, et al. Outcomes assess- ment in fracture healing trials : a primer [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24 Suppl 1 :$71-$75. DOI:10. 1097/BOT.0b013e3181ca3flM.
  • 10Goldsmith CH, Boers M, Bombardier C, et al. Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes : development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee[J]. J Rheumatol, 1993, 20(3) :561-565.

共引文献902

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部