摘要
研究由一个制造商和一个零售商构成的二级供应链,引入供应中断风险并通过斯塔克伯格博弈对比分析制造商风险承担策略、零售商风险承担策略以及风险-收益协调策略三种不同的风险承担策略下供应链的产品质量决策及其影响.结果显示:当供应中断损失率较低时,无论采取哪种风险承担策略,供应中断风险损失率上升都会降低制造商的产品质量,影响零售商的销售价格以及市场需求,降低制造商和零售商的利润;制造商风险承担策略会降低产品质量、产品价格、市场需求以及供应链成员绩效;而零售商承担风险策略则有利于提高产品质量和供应链成员绩效;采取风险-收益协调策略能提高产品质量以及供应链成员利润,其程度取决于制造商和零售商的议价能力,制造商的议价能力越强,其产品质量和利润就越高,零售商的利润就越低.比较而言,风险-收益协调策略是最优的.
The secondary supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer is studied,and the product quality decisions and their effects of the supply chain under three different risk-taking strategies,namely the manufacturer's risk-taking strategy,the retailer's risk-taking strategy and the risk-benefit coordination strategy are analyzed through the Stackelberg game.The results show that when the supply interruption loss rate is low,no matter which risk-taking strategy is adopted,the increase in the supply interruption risk loss rate will reduce the quality of the manufacturer's products,affect the retailer's sales price and market demand,and reduce the profit of the manufacturer and the retailer.Manufacturer risk-taking strategies reduce product quality,product prices,market demand,and supply chain member performance.The retailer's risk-taking strategy is conducive to improving product quality and supply chain member performance.The degree to which a risk-benefit coordination strategy can improve product quality and the profitability of supply chain members depends on the bargaining power of manufacturers and retailers,and as the manufacturer's bargaining power increases,the higher the manufacturer's product quality and profit,the lower the retailer's profit,which is the best risk-taking strategy.
作者
刘凤根
刘东赐
欧阳资生
张敏
LIU Fenggen;LIU Dongci;OUYANG Zisheng;ZHANG Min(School of Finance,Hunan University of Technology&Business,Changsha 410205;School of Business,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081;School of Economics&Trade,Hunan University of Technology&Business,Changsha 410205)
出处
《系统科学与数学》
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第11期3011-3028,共18页
Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基金
国家自然科学基金基础科学中心项目(72088101)
国家社会科学基金重点项目(21ATJ009)
湖南省自然科学基金面上项目(2023JJ30202)
湖南省社会科学基金项目(21YBA149)
湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX20221157)资助课题。
关键词
供应中断
风险承担策略
产品质量决策
斯塔克伯格博弈
Supply interruptions
risk-taking strategies
product quality decision
Stackelberg game
