摘要
我国《著作权法》第1条是立法目的条款。以在裁判说理中所起作用为标准,可将《著作权法》立法目的条款的司法适用类型化为直接依据型、法律续造型、制定法的解释型、法律行为解释型、论证补强型、文书美化型与例行罗列型。《著作权法》立法目的条款的司法适用存在错误适用与瑕疵适用问题。前者包括实质误用与形式误用;后者包括说理不充分适用、理解不统一适用与冗余适用。规范《著作权法》立法目的条款的司法适用,需秉持“克制”援引的基本立场,摒弃整条援引方式,并明确条文中不同层次立法目的各自指向,遵循绝对禁止援引场合与有条件援引场合的适用要求。
Article 1 of China’s Copyright Law is a legislative purpose clause.According to the role,it plays in judging and reasoning,the judicial application of the legislative purpose clause of Copyright Law can be divided into six different types.The judicial application of the legislative purpose clause of Copyright Law has the problems of wrong application and flawed application.The former includes substantive misuse and formal misuse.The latter includes the application with insufficient reasons,the application with inconsistent understanding of the provisions and the unnecessary application.To standardize the judicial application of the legislative purpose clause of Copyright Law,we need to uphold the basic position of“restraint”,abandon the whole way of citing,clarify the meaning of legislative purpose at different levels in the clause,and distinguish between occasions that can never be cited and occasions that can be cited conditionally.
作者
赵筝
赵陶钧
Zhao Zheng;Zhao Taojun
出处
《电子知识产权》
2023年第11期83-94,共12页
Electronics Intellectual Property
基金
教育部、国家外国专家局高等学校学科创新引智计划(111计划)“新时代科技革命与知识产权学科创新”(项目编号:B18058)。
关键词
著作权法
立法目的条款
裁判文书
说理论证
法条援引
Copyright Law
Legislative Purpose Clause
Adjudicative Instruments
Giving Reasons
Invoking Provisions
