摘要
我国国情和司法实践之独特性决定了类案检索机制之定位应当是“区域性”而非“全域性”。上述特点决定了我国“区域性”类案检索机制之构建应当是对我国司法实践经验的总结和提炼,而非简单借鉴域外法治。通过对我国类案检索机制“区域性”试点之考察,可以发现我国“区域性”类案检索机制存在着适用主体差异性、类案识别标准不一致性以及类案检索效力模糊性之弊端。应当明确法官与当事人在类案检索机制具体适用上的权利义务分配,并且统一区域内类案识别标准,在明确类案检索机制的辅助作用的同时,通过层次化的效力构建总结和完善我国“区域性”类案检索机制在司法实践中的具体适用。
The uniqueness of China's national conditions and judicial practice determines that the positioning of the similar case retrieval mechanism should be“regional”rather than“whole domain”.The above characteristics determine that the construction of China's“regional”similar case retrieval mechanism should be a summary and refinement of China's judicial practice experience,rather than simply learning from the extraterritorial rule of law.Through the investigation of the“regional”pilot of similar case retrieval mechanism in China,it can be found that the“regional”similar case retrieval mechanism in China has the disadvantages of the differences between different applicable subjects,the inconsistency of similar cases identification standard and the ambiguity of case retrieval effect.The allocation of rights and obligations between judges and parties in the specific application of the similar case retrieval mechanism should be clarified,and the identification standards of similar cases in the region should be unified.While clarifying the auxiliary role of the similar case retrieval mechanism,the specific application of the“regional”case retrieval mechanism in judicial practice is summarized and improved through the construction of hierarchical effectiveness.
作者
高星阁
GAO Xing-ge(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《时代法学》
2024年第1期30-39,共10页
Presentday Law Science
基金
2022年度重庆市教委人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“‘区域性’类案检索机制的规范化研究”(项目编号:22SKJD039)的阶段性成果
2020年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“国家治理体系中民事执行现代化研究”(项目编号:20&ZD195)的阶段性成果。
关键词
类案检索机制
区域协调发展
同案同判
类案识别
similar case retrieval mechanism
coordinated regional development
same cases and same judgments
similar cases identification
