摘要
[目的/意义]在学术评价中,权重赋值的科学性与合理性问题被忽视了。[过程/方法]文章将质量诊断的思想引入到学术评价,提出了学术评价权重赋值质量诊断的理念,并建立了理论框架和评估指标体系,对权重赋值对学术评价结果的影响机制进行了深入分析。[结果/结论]必须充分认识学术评价权重诊断的重要性;应建立全方位多步骤的权重赋值质量诊断体系;客观赋权方法在权重诊断时不占优势;权重赋值质量诊断思想也可拓展到所有多属性学术评价领域。
[Purpose/significance]In academic evaluation,the scientificity and rationality of weight assignment are ignored.[Method/process]This paper introduces the idea of quality diagnosis into academic evaluation,puts forward the concept of weight assignment quality diagnosis of academic evaluation,establishes a theoretical framework and evaluation index system,and conducts an in-depth analysis of the mechanism of weight assignment on academic evaluation results.[Result/conclusion]Firstly,the importance of weight diagnosis of academic evaluation must be fully understood.Secondly,a comprehensive and multi-step weight assignment quality diagnosis system should be established.Thirdly,objective weighting methods are not dominant in weight diagnosis.Fourthly,the idea of weight assignment quality diagnosis can also be extended to all multi-attribute academic evaluation.
出处
《情报理论与实践》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第4期84-89,104,共7页
Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金
浙江省自然科学基金重点项目“制造业从数量型创新向质量型创新转型机制研究”(项目编号:Z21G030004)
广东省哲学社会科学规划青年项目“广东省卡脖子技术突击创新的政府投资风险规避及路径对策研究”(项目编号:GD23YGL31)
广州市哲学社会科学规划年度项目“广东省关键核心技术突击创新的政府投资风险防范研究”(项目编号:2023GZGJ80)的成果。
关键词
学术评价
指标体系
多属性评价
权重赋值
质量诊断
academic evaluation
index system
multi-attribute evaluation
weight assignment
quality diagnosis
