期刊文献+

苏教版新教材"批判性思维"栏目分析与教学建议

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 教材理解和教材使用是课程实施的重要部分,知识本位的教材理解及教材使用观需要改变。以苏教版新教材《化学反应原理》"批判性思维"栏目为例,讨论该栏目设置的功能意义,对该栏目6个具体内容分别进行了教学可行性分析。通过分析说明,对教材"批判性思维"栏目编写提出了改进教学属性和清晰设置标准两点建议,对该栏目教学提出了明确素养能力指向、处理素材内容及实现目标达成三点实施建议。以86页栏目内容为例,阐述批判性思维栏目的进阶性教学目标,表现了新教材中该创新栏目的重要意义。
作者 许磊 朱志江
出处 《中学化学教学参考》 2024年第19期37-40,共4页 Teaching Reference of Middle School Chemistry
基金 江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划重点课题“化学概念认知逻辑和策略方法研究”(课题编号:B/2022/03/193)阶段性研究成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1彭堃墀.非经典光场及其在量子信息中的应用[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版),2007,30(2):173-180. 被引量:5
  • 2Ennis, Robert. "Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. "Teaching Philosophy 14 ( 1 ) . 1991.6.
  • 3Scriven, Michael and Paul, Richard. A Working Definition of ritical Thinking http ://www. sonama, edu/CThink/definect. html.1995.12.6; Paul, Richard. Critical Thinking: Basic Questions and Answers http ://www, sonoma. edu/cthink/
  • 4Bailin, Sharon, Roland Case, Jerrold Coombs, and LeRoi Daniels. "Operationalizing Critical Thinking: ACurriculum, Instruction and Assessment Model." Paper adapted from Bailin et al. , "A Conception of CriticalThinking for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment," funded by the British Columbia Ministry of Education and Minister responsible for Multiculturalism and Human Rights, May 1993.2.298.
  • 5H. Siegel. Educating Reason: Retionality , Critical Thinking and Education. New Yourk: Routledge. 1988.23.34.
  • 6Fans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. Foundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1996. 186.
  • 7R. H. Johnson. The Problem of Defining Critical Thinking. In S. Norris (ed.), The Generalizability of Critical Thinking ( New York: Teachers College Press. 1992.49.
  • 8Alec Fisher and Michael Scriven. Critical Thinking. Its Definition and Assessment. Point Reyes, CA:Edgepress. 1997.20.
  • 9Kees De Glopper. Argumentation. Vol. 16.2002. 247 -251.
  • 10Facione, Peter A.. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction ( executive summary). In The Delphi Report, Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press. 1990.

共引文献246

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部