摘要
程颐乃《春秋》宋学之推助者,视《春秋》为“圣人之用”,以为学者只观《春秋》亦可尽道。其曾揭示治经之要领,如“《传》为案,《经》为断”“以传考经之事迹,以经别传之真伪”,凸显了《左传》解经之功能。晚年著《春秋传》,阐发正人伦、谨名分、尊周王、攘夷狄诸大义;且持天理、人道取代微辞隐义,进行创造性诠释。对于《春秋》或书或不书、或称或不称之笔削,与夺进退、褒贬劝惩之指义,抑纵、微显相反相成之笔法,事同则辞同、事同而辞异诸书法义例,观百物、聚众材与张本继末、系统宏观之比事属辞解经方法,程颐《春秋》学多有具体而微之提示。
Cheng Yi was the promoter of the study of Chun Qiu in the Song dynasty.He regarded Chun Qiu as the use of sages,and thought that scholars could accomplish their thoughts just by reading it.He revealed main points of the study of Confucian classics.For instance,Zuo Zhuan stated historical events while Chun Qiu stated judgements;applying Zuo Zhuan to examine the deeds of Chun Qiu,while applying Chun Qiu to distinguish the authenticity of Zuo Zhuan.Thus the function of Zuo Zhuan in interpreting the classics was highlighted.In his later years,he wrote Chun Qiu Zhuan,which expounded on the righteousness of human relationships,compliance with the duty,respect for the King of Zhou,expelling of the barbarians.He also held principles of justice and humanity to replace the subtle and hidden meanings of the words and to carry out creative interpretations.Cheng Yi's Chun Qiu Zhuan has some rough hints with regard to the writing style in Chun Qiu of whether to write or not to write,to name or not to name;with the meaning of“to seize,to advance or retreat,to praise,to depreciate,to persuade or to punish,”the writing method of“to suppress,to control and to reveal,”the writing style of“if things were the same,then the words would be the same,”and“when things were the same,but the words were different”.Observing all things and gathering all materials,it is a systematic and macroscopic method of event arrangement and word connection.
作者
张高评
ZHANG Gaoping(Department of Chinese Literature,Cheng Kung University,Tainan 701401,China)
出处
《同济大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第4期91-100,共10页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
