摘要
目的评价解剖式[牙合]与舌向集中[牙合]全口义齿修复后患者的咀嚼效率、咬合功能指标及患者满意度。方法选取2021年4月—12月南京市口腔医院修复科无牙颌患者20例,随机分为两组,分别为两组患者制作解剖式[牙合]全口义齿与舌向集中[牙合]全口义齿,在义齿使用1个月时通过吸光度法对两种[牙合]型全口义齿咀嚼效率进行测定,使用TeeTester咬合分析系统测定两组患者相关咬合功能指标同期进行全口义齿满意度调查表。采用SPSS 20.0对数据进行统计学分析。结果舌向集中[牙合]组咀嚼效率、咬合功能指标低于解剖式[牙合]组,患者满意度中大部分项目亦低于解剖式[牙合]组,在语音恢复方面上高于解剖式[牙合]组,其中COF⁃y差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论舌向集中[牙合]型式全口义齿与解剖式[牙合]型式全口义齿在咀嚼效率、咬合功能及患者满意度方面差异并无统计学意义;舌向集中[牙合]型全口义齿在患者的掌握、适应及日常使用上具有较好表现。
Objective In this study,we compared the masticatory efficiency,occlusal functional indexes,and satisfaction of lingualized occlusion(LO)vs.anatomic occlusion(AO)and discussed the difference between these occlusions.Methods Twenty edentulous patients were included in this clinical trial during 2021 April to December.They were divided into 2 groups according to their denture occlusion.Masticatory efficiency was tested by chewing the same amount of peanuts(by weight)and then the absorption of the solution was compared under a spectrophotometer after wearing dentures for 1 month.The TeeTester occlusion analysis system was used to test masticatory function,and satisfaction research was conducted for the edentulous patients at this time point as well.Finally,statistical analyses were conducted to compare the difference in masticatory efficiency between AO and LO by SPSS 20.0.Results The indexes of LO were worse than AO in masticatory efficiency,masticatory function and most of satisfaction research,while LO was better than AO in speech recovery.The difference was only statistically significant in COF⁃y of masticatory function(P<0.05).Conclusion LO is similar with AO in terms of masticatory efficiency,satisfaction and denture stability;LO has good performance in dentures fit and use for patients.
作者
王佩露
魏煦
杨晓静
聂蓉蓉
孟翔峰
WANG Peilu;WEI Xu;YANG Xiaojing;NIE Rongrong;MENG Xiangfeng(Department of Prosthetics,Medical School of Nanjing University,Nanjing Stomatological Hospital,Nanjing 210000,China)
出处
《口腔医学》
CAS
2024年第11期851-855,共5页
Stomatology
基金
南京大学医学院附属口腔医院3456骨干人才资助项目(0222E301)。
