摘要
家庭教育由“家事”上升为“国事”后,司法部门介入家庭教育是《中华人民共和国家庭教育促进法》(下文简称“《家庭教育促进法》”)实施的实践性抓手,以“训诫-指导-处罚”的层层递进的惩戒措施体现了《家庭教育促进法》的司法柔性、司法韧性与司法刚性。《家庭教育促进法》在删除了《家庭教育法(草案)》的诸多负面惩罚性措施的同时,并未充分补足支持性措施,导致在实践中司法部门无法准确回应“何时”介入与“如何”介入的问题。欲实现家庭教育与司法介入的“德法相融”,需要平衡比例原则下司法部门介入家庭教育的必要性限度,保持谦抑立场,同时也需要提升规范性与强制性,增强家庭教育令的司法张力。
After the rise of family education from“family affairs”to“national affairs”,the intervention of the judicial department in family education is a practical lever for the implementation of the“Family Education Promotion Law”.The progressive punitive measures of“admonition-guidance-punishment”reflect the judicial flexibility,judicial resilience,and judicial rigidity of the“Family Education Promotion Law”.The Family Education Promotion Law,while removing many negative punitive measures from the Draft Family Education Law,has not fully supplemented supportive measures,resulting in the inability of the judicial mechanism to accurately respond to the issues of“when”and“how”to intervene in practice.To achieve the integration of morality and law between family education and judicial intervention,it is necessary to balance the necessity of judicial intervention in family education under the principle of proportionality,maintain a humble stance,and at the same time,improve standardization and compulsion,and enhance the judicial tension of the family education orders.
作者
徐婧
XU Jing(Law School,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China)
出处
《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
2025年第2期97-106,共10页
Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
福建省习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心福州大学研究基地专项研究项目“中国式现代化经济发展的法治环境建设”(编号:23FZUJDC07)
福州大学研究生教育教学改革项目“人工智能与卓越法治人才教育耦合赋能模式研究”(编号:FYJG2023036)。
关键词
家庭教育促进法
司法部门
家庭教育
优良家风
Family Education Promotion Law
judicial department
family education
good family culture
