摘要
在乡村振兴战略背景下,明晰乡村的主体性水平,从乡村主体性视角透视乡村地域系统的发展水平与影响路径,对理解当前乡村社会“主体在场”与“主体缺场”并行逻辑下如何更好地推进乡村人地关系的适配与协同重构具有重要意义。本文以广西阳朔县漓江和遇龙河两河流域20个行政村为研究对象,在探讨乡村主体性概念框架、建立乡村主体性影响乡村地域系统协调发展理论模型的基础上,通过评价指标体系构建和熵权TOPSIS法,测度乡村主体性水平及乡村发展水平,进而采用模糊集定性比较分析法探究乡村主体性对乡村地域系统协调发展的多元影响路径。研究表明:(1)乡村主体性理论具备推动乡村地位回归的话语意义、奠定乡村本体内涵的概念意义及明确“农民主体性”的动力意义,可解构为主体类型、主体意识、主体行动3个维度;(2)阳朔县两河流域乡村主体性水平较为均衡、各维度水平的空间分异显著;(3)乡村地域系统包括人口、自然环境、人文环境、经济、资源五大子系统,阳朔县两河流域乡村处于中低发展水平;(4)乡村主体性单个要素并不构成影响乡村地域系统耦合协调度的必要条件,乡村地域系统高耦合协调度的组态路径以乡村主体性充分型为核心,乡村地域系统低耦合协调度的引发以乡村主体缺失型路径为主。
Against the backdrop of China's rural revitalization strategy,this study clarified the concept of rural subjectivity and developed a framework from the perspective of the development status and reconstruction of the rural regional system.The study aimed to outline the impact of rural subjectivity on the rural regional system.Twenty villages in the Lijiang River and Yulong River basins in Yangshuo county,which have been reconstructed for tourism development,were taken as case studies.This study applied questionnaire data,an entropy weight TOPSIS method,and a coupled coordination model to assess the levels of rural subjectivity,the development of the rural regional system,and their coupled coordination.The fsQCA method was used to analyze the diverse influence pathways of rural subjectivity on the rural regional system.The findings showed that:(1)The theory of rural subjectivity held discursive significance in promoting the reinstatement of rural status;conceptual significance in fostering a dynamic and open rural ontology;and motivational significance in enhancing rural residents'subjective status and role.(2)The level of rural subjectivity in the two river basins of Yangshuo county was relatively balanced,but there were notable spatial variations in the levels of each dimension.(3)The rural regional system comprised five major subsystems:population,natural environment,human environment,economy,and resources.The rural regional system in the two river basins was at a low to medium level of development,exhibiting significant differences in the levels of each subsystem,both in terms of results and spatial distribution.(4)Individual elements of rural subjectivity did not constitute the necessary conditions to influence the coupling and coordination degree of the rural regional system.The pattern of influence for a high coupling coordination degree in the rural regional system can be summarized as"sufficient rural subjectivity"whereas a pattern of"insufficient heterogeneity of rural subjects"would result in a low coupling coordination degree.
作者
张凌媛
孙九霞
ZHANG Lingyuan;SUN Jiuxia(School of Tourism Management,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China;Key Laboratory of Greater Bay Area Humanities Community,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China;Institute of Guangdong,Hong Kong and Macao Development Studies,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China;Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory(Zhuhai),Zhuhai 519085,Guangdong,China)
出处
《地理学报》
北大核心
2025年第2期453-474,共22页
Acta Geographica Sinica
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(22&ZD190)。
关键词
主体性
乡村主体性
乡村地域系统
耦合协调
阳朔县
subjectivity
rural subjectivity
rural regional system
coupling coordination
Yangshuo county
