摘要
落空费用赔偿旨在解决违约损害赔偿面临的困境,故具有重要意义。我国司法实践通常支持债权人请求赔偿“信赖合同履行支出的费用”,但往往将其作为“损害”赔偿,忽视了两者的不同:费用支出与违约行为欠缺损害赔偿构成要件下的因果关系。虽然学界通过借鉴德国学说,试图为“费用赔偿”提供理论基础,但往往未注意所采学说的弊端,所作修正也未能真正地弥补德国学说的漏洞。为此,应将“盈利性推定学说”与“落空说”相结合,分别为“盈利性合同”与“非盈利性合同”提供理论基础,且将《民法典》第584条、第577条分别作为其请求权基础。
The compensation for frustrated expenses aims to address the dilemmas faced by damages for breach of contract,and thus is of great significance.In China's judicial practice,creditors' requests for compensation for “the expenses incurred in reliance on the performance of the contract” are usually supported,but they are often regarded as “damage” compensation,ignoring the differences between the two.There is a lack of causal relationship under the constituent elements of damages in terms of the expense expenditure and the act of breach of contract.Although the academic community has attempted to provide a theoretical basis for “expense compensation” by drawing on German theories,it often fails to notice the drawbacks of the adopted theories,and the modifications made have not truly remedied the loopholes in the German theories.Therefore,the “presumption of profitability theory” should be combined with the “frustration theory” to provide theoretical bases for “profitable contracts” and “non-profitable contracts” respectively,and Articles 584 and 577 of the Civil Code should be taken as the bases of the right of claim respectively.
出处
《南大法学》
2025年第2期146-167,共22页
NanJing University Law Journal
基金
国家留学基金委员会“国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(202108310207)”资助。
关键词
费用赔偿
违约责任
信赖利益
盈利性推定
落空说
Expense Compensation
Liability for Breach of Contract
Reliance Interest
Presumption of Profitability
Frustration Theory
