期刊文献+

吻合器痔上粘膜环切钉合、肛垫复位固定术与外切内扎术治疗Ⅲ°-Ⅳ°痔的比较研究 被引量:58

Procedure for proplapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) versus Milligan-Morgan hameorrhoidectomy:a randomised controlled study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较吻合器痔上粘膜环切钉合、肛垫复位固定术 (procedureforprolapseandhem orrhoids ,PPH)与外切内扎术 (Milligan Morgan手术 )治疗Ⅲ° Ⅳ°痔的临床效果。方法对 90例Ⅲ° Ⅳ°痔随机分为实验组 (Ⅰ组 )和对照组 (Ⅱ组 ) ,分别进行PPH及Milligan Morgan手术治疗。对手术时间、疼痛指数、注射止痛药次数、住院时间、恢复工作时间、住院费用等进行比较研究。结果两组总的症状改善满意率分别为 89% (Ⅰ组 )及 81 % (Ⅱ组 ) ,在疼痛指数、注射止痛药次数、住院时间、恢复工作时间方面 ,实验组明显优于对照组。结论PPH治疗Ⅲ° Ⅳ°痔的近期疗效优于Milligan Morgan手术。 Objective To compare the short term outcome of PPH with Milligan Morgan hameorrhoidectomy. MethodsNinety cases of Ⅲ ° Ⅳ °degree hemorrhoids admitted for surgical treatment were randomly assigned to PPH ( n =45) or Milligan Morgan( n =45).ResultsThe difference was statistically significant between the two groups in terms of pain index ?operative time?length of hospital stay? time required for returning to normal activity and hospital fee. The above factors were found more favourable in PPH group, with no severe complications developed in neither of the two groups.The symptom improvement rate was 88% in PPH group and 81% in Milligan group.ConclusionPPH is a safe and effective procedure for Ⅲ ° Ⅳ °hemorrhoids and its shorter term outcome is better than Milligan Morgan procedure.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2002年第12期714-715,共2页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Brian JM,John RTM, John EH. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.Lancet, 2000,355:782-785.
  • 2张东铭.痔的现代概念[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2001,4(1):58-60. 被引量:197
  • 3Beattie GC, Lam JPH,Loudon MA. A prospective evaluation of the introduction of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Disease , 2000,2:1-6.
  • 4Gunnar A,Hans K,Staffan H. Closed vs.open hemorrhoidectomy-is there any difference?Dis Colon Rectum, 2000,43:31-34.
  • 5Beattie GC,Loudon MA. Follow-up confirms sustained benefit of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of prolapsing haemohorroids. Br J Surg, 2001,88:850-852.

二级参考文献10

  • 1张东铭.直肠上动脉的分支类型[J].肛肠杂志,1983,4:9-9.
  • 2Thomson WHF. The nature ofhemorrhoids. Br J Surg, 1975, 62: 542-552.
  • 3Marino AW Jr. Anorectal surgery hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum, 1980, 23:211-222.
  • 4Hancock BD, Smith K. The internal sphincter and Lord's procedure for haemorrhiods.Br J Surg, 1975, 62: 833-836.
  • 5Sun WM, Read NW, Sharthouse AJ. Hypertensive anal cushions as a cause of the highanal canal pressures in patients with haemorrhoids. BrJ Surg, 1990, 77:458-461.
  • 6Alexander J. The nature of piles. Br Med J, 1982,285: 1137-1140.
  • 7张东铭.痔的现代概念及其解剖生理学基础[J].大肠肛门病外科杂志,2000,6(3):4-11. 被引量:78
  • 8黄筵庭.痔的近代概念[J].大肠肛门病外科杂志,2000,6(3):20-23. 被引量:62
  • 9张东铭.痔的分类与治疗学的现代概念[J].大肠肛门病外科杂志,2000,6(3):24-35. 被引量:54
  • 10张东铭.痔与盆底动力学关系[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2000,20(11):24-27. 被引量:14

共引文献196

同被引文献290

引证文献58

二级引证文献414

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部