3Puls R W, Paul C J, Powell B M. The application of in situ permeable reactive (zero-vulent iron) harder technology for the remediation of chromate-contaminated groundwater: a field test [J]. Appl Geochem, 1999, 14(8):989- 1000.
4O' Hannesin S F. A field demonstration of a permeable rection wall for the In situ abiotic degradation of halogenated aliphafic organic compounds [D]. Ontario, Canada University of Waterloo, 1993.
5Vogan J L, Foeht R M, Clark D K, et al. Performance evaluation of a permeable reactive barrier for remediation of dissolved chlorinated solvents in groundwater[J]. J Hazard Mater, 1999, 68(1): 97-108.
6Smythh D J A, Shiakaze S G, Cheey J A. Hydraulic performance of permeable barriers for in situ treatment of contaminated groundwater[J].Land Contain Reclam, 1997, 5(3):131 - 137.
7Robertson W D, Cherry J A. Long-term performance of the waterloo denitrification barrier[J]. Land Contain Reclam, 1997, 5(3) :183 - 188.
8Reynolds G W, Hoff J T, Gillbam R W. Sampling Bias Caused by Materials Used to Monitor Haloearbons in Groundwater[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 1990, 24 (1): 135-142.
9Puls Robert W, Blowers David W, Gillham Robert W. Long-term performance monitoring for a permeable reactive barrier at the U S Coast Guard Support Center, Elizabeth City, North Carolina[J]. J Hazard Mater, 1999, 68(1): 109- 124.
10Ludwig Ralph D, McGregor Rick G, Blowes David W, et al.A permeable reactive barrier for treatment of heavy metals[J]. Ground Water,2002 , 40(1): 59-66.
