期刊文献+

浅谈非随机对照试验的系统评价 被引量:5

Brief introduction to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 非随机对照试验的系统评价与随机对照试验的系统评价一样是普遍开展的。在某些情况下我们必须依靠非随机对照试验的系统评价,但对其结果及应用应持审慎的态度。因为其结果可能受到偏倚或混杂因素的歪曲。一个专门的Cochrane方法学小组——非随机对照研究方法学小组已注册成立,并致力于为Cochrane系统评价者提供何时以及如何纳入非随机对照试验的指南。 Systematic reviews of non-randomized studies are as common as reviews of randomized controlled trials. In some circumstances we must depend on such reviews. But we should be very prudent on their results and applications because confounding and bias often distort the results of non-randomized studies. A special methods group——Non-Randomized Studies Methods Group had been registered and aimed to make recommendations about when and how to include non-randomized studies in Cochrane systematic reviews.
出处 《循证医学》 CSCD 2002年第4期225-226,229,共3页 The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
关键词 非随机对照试验 循证医学 检索 权重 异质性 clinical research evidence-based medicine systematic review non-randomized studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Egger M, Schneider M, Davey Smith G. Spurious precision?Meta-analysis of Observational studies [J]. BMJ, 1998, 316:140 - 145
  • 2Gurwitz J H, Col N F, Avorn J. The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction [J].JAMA, 1992, 268:1417 - 1422
  • 3Wilson C W M. The protective effect of auto-immune buccal urine therapy (AIBUT)against the Raynaud phenomenon [J]. Med Hypotheses, 1984, 13:99 - 107
  • 4Beal S M, Finch C F. An overview of retrospective case-control studies investigating the relationship between prone sleeping position and SIDS [J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 1991, 27(6):334 - 339
  • 5刘建平.非随机研究的系统评价[J].中国循证医学,2001,1(3):137-139. 被引量:35
  • 6Kunz R, Oxman A D. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomized and non-randomized clinical trials [J]. BMJ, 1998,317:1185 -1190
  • 7Petitti D B. Hormone replacement therapy and heart disease prevention: experimentation trumps observation [J]. JAMA, 1998,280:650 - 652
  • 8Beral V. "The practice of meta-analysis": Discussion. Metaanalysis of observational studies: A case study of work in progress [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:165 - 166
  • 9Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews//Chalmers I, Altman D G, eds.Systematic reviews [M]. London: BMJ Publications, 1995

共引文献34

同被引文献60

引证文献5

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部