摘要
国际学术界对冷战历史的研究从来就与“冷战”缠绕在一起 ,也正因为如此 ,形成了局限性甚强的冷战史“旧研究”。对“旧研究”的自省与冷战之遽终使J L 盖迪斯领风气之先的“冷战史新研究”应运而生。盖迪斯的反思浓缩了“冷战史新研究”的若干基本特征 ,如 :全新时空框架的获得 ;基于多边档案、资料进行研究的可能 ;真正意义上的国际冷战史研究格局的形成 ;意识形态的重新界定与重新认识等。此外 ,在“冷战史新研究”的形成过程中 ,中国学者贡献良多 ,已成长为一支不可忽视的研究力量 ;因此 ,“冷战史新研究”也折射出中外学术交流的基本困局 ,耐人深思。
Research on Cold War history in the international scholarly community was long entwined with the Cold War itself, resulting in serious drawbacks in the “Old” Cold War history. Reflecting upon this “old” historical study and the end of the Cold War brought about a “new” Cold War history, epitomized by John Lewis Gaddis. Gaddis reflections highlighted the basic elements of new Cold War history: the attainment of a new temporal and spatial framework, the possibility of research based on multilateral archives and materials, the formation of an international field of Cold War history in the real sense of the term, and the redefinition and re understanding of ideology. Chinese researchers have played an important role in the formation of the New Cold War History. Therefore one may detect the fundamental dilemma in Chinas international academic exchanges.
出处
《历史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第3期3-22,共20页
Historical Research
