期刊文献+

两种静脉输液拔针按压方法的效果比较 被引量:52

Comparison on the Effect of Two Different Pressing Ways after Extraction of Venous Infusion Needle
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨最佳的静脉输液拔针按压方法。方法 :对 2 3 4例病人 2 10 6次静脉输液分别采用平行按压法和横行按压法 ,按压时间分为小于 1min、1min~、 2min~ 3min ,观察皮下出血和 /或皮下淤血的发生情况。结果 :平行按压法明显优于横行按压法 (P <0 .0 1) ,按压时间大于 1min为宜。结论 :静脉输液拔针采用平行按压法 ,按压时间不小于 Objective: to probe into local pressing ways of patients undergoing intravenous fluid infusion after extraction of infusion needle. Method: a total of 2 106 times of extraction of 234 cases undergoing fluids infusion were given parallel or vertical local pressing respectively. Pressing time of patients were divided into less than 1 minute, 1min~, and 2 min~3 min groups. Subcutaneous hemorrhage or ecchymoma of all patients were observed. Results: it showed that parallel pressing was superior to vertical pressing for patients undergoing fluid infusion after needle extraction (P<0.01). For the pressing time, it is suitable to press more than 1 minute. Conclusion: patients of undergoing fluid infusion should given parallel pressing for more than 1 minute after the extraction of infusion needle. Thus, it could reduce subcutaneous hemorrhage of patients effectively.
作者 曾龙英
机构地区 四川省人民医院
出处 《护理研究(下半月)》 2004年第1期155-156,共2页
基金 自选研究课题
关键词 静脉输液 拔针 按压方法 护理 Intravenous fluid infusion Extraction of needle Pressing method
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1丁言雯 主编.护理学基础[M].北京∶人民卫生出版社,2002.169~173.

共引文献10

同被引文献214

引证文献52

二级引证文献335

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部