期刊文献+

慢性咳嗽患者支气管激发试验的护理干预

Nursing Intervention of Bronchial Provocation Test for Chronic Cough Patients
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析慢性咳嗽患者支气管激发试验的护理干预。方法选取选取我院2016年2月至2016年12月收治的慢性咳嗽患者60例作为研究对象。将60例患者随机分为两组,实验组患者有30例,对照组患者有30例。两组患者都进行肺功能基础测试和不同剂量乙酰甲胆碱吸入后的肺功能测试。为实验组患者采取支气管激发试验的全程护理干预,为对照组患者采取常规护理。对比两组患者检查情况和护理满意度。结果实验组患者的检查阳性率为80%,对照组患者的检查阳性率为46.67%。实验组患者有15例在吸入累计剂量0.48mg的乙酰甲胆碱后出现FEV1下降20%以上,9例在吸入累计剂量1.3mg的乙酰甲胆碱后出现FEV1下降20%以上。对照组患者有6例患者在吸入累计剂量0.48mg乙酰甲胆碱后出现FEV1下降20%以上,8例在吸入累计剂量1.3mg的乙酰甲胆碱后出现FEV1下降20%以上。实验组患者的护理满意度为96.67%,对照组患者的护理满意度为56.67%,实验组患者的护理满意度明显高度对照组,P<0.05表示统计学有意义。结论乙酰甲胆碱吸入的支气管激发试验是临床常用的哮喘特异性检查方法,对于反复发作的咳嗽患者进行检查,能够有效的确认咳嗽特异性哮喘疾病,采取有效的护理能够促进实验顺利完成,同时还能保证检查的准确率,对临床试验具有重要意义。 Objective To analyze nursing intervention of bronchial provocation test of chronic cough patients. Methods choose 60 cases chronic cough patients treated in our hospital from February 2016 to December 2016 as study subjects. Divide them into two groups randomly, 30 cases in experimental group and 30 in control group. Carry on basic pulmonary function test and pulmonary function test after inhalation of different doses of methacholine for two groups. Experimental group was treated with whole course nursing intervention of bronchial provocation test, and control group with routine nursing care. Compare examination and nursing satisfaction of two groups. Results positive rate of experimental group was 80%, and that of control group was 46.67%. 15 cases of experimental group had FEV1 decrease by more than 20% after inhalation of cumulative doses of 0.48 mg methacholine, and 9 cases had FEV1 decrease by more than 20% after inhalation of cumulative doses of 1.3 mg methacholine. 6 cases of control group had FEV1 decrease by more than 20% after inhalation of cumulative doses of 0.48 mg methacholine, and 8 cases had FEV1 decrease by more than 20% after inhalation of cumulative doses of 1.3 mg methacholine. Nursing satisfaction of experimental group was 96.67%, obviously higher than 56.67% of control group with statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion inhaled methacholine bronchial provocation test is a common clinical asthma specific detection method, it can confirm specificity of cough asthma effectively for recurrent cough patients, and effective nursing intervention can promote experiment successfully, and ensure accuracy of detection, which has important significance for clinical experiment.
作者 周立敏
出处 《智慧健康》 2017年第9期28-30,共3页 Smart Healthcare
关键词 慢性咳嗽 支气管激发试验 护理效果 Chronic cough Bronchial provocation test Nursing effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献73

  • 1任红,马光玲.咳嗽变异性哮喘30例分析[J].临床误诊误治,2004,17(8):600-601. 被引量:7
  • 2马洪明,朱礼星,赖克方,朱彤,孙宝清,欧阳铭,钟南山.不明原因慢性咳嗽的诊断探讨[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2003,26(11):675-678. 被引量:221
  • 3王居召,李巧香.咳嗽变异性哮喘一例误诊报告[J].临床误诊误治,2005,18(9):639-639. 被引量:3
  • 4中华医学会呼吸病学分会哮喘学组.咳嗽的诊断与治疗指南(草案)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2005,28(11):738-744. 被引量:1456
  • 5郑劲平,陈荣昌,钟南山.肺功能学[M].广州:广东科学技术出版社,2007:322-347.
  • 6King GG, Salome CM. Multimodality measurements of small airways disease[ J]. Eur Respir J,2006,27 (2) : 250 - 252.
  • 7Aljassim F, Robinson PD, Sigurs N, et al. A whisper from the silent lung zone [ J ]. Pediatr Pulmonol,2009,44 ( 8 ) : 829 - 832.
  • 8Scichilone N, Battaglia S, Olivieri D, et al. The role of small airways in monitoring the response to asthma treatment:What is beyond FEV1 [ J ] ? Allergy,2009,64 ( 11 ) : 1563 - 1569.
  • 9Habukawa C, Nagasaka Y, Murakami K, et al. High - pitched breath sounds indicate airflow limitation in asymptomatic asthmatic children[ J ]. Respirology,2009,14(3) :399 -403.
  • 10Sturton G,Persson C ,Barnes PJ. Small airways: An important but neglected target in the treatment of obstructive airway diseases[ J ]. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2008,29 ( 7 ) : 340 - 345.

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部