摘要
"效率优先、兼顾公正"的相对工具主义价值主张,以及"打击犯罪与保障人权并重"的价值平衡主张,均不可能正确解决我国刑事诉讼的价值取向问题。刑事诉讼价值冲突的本质是国家权力与公民权利的冲突。确立"人权保障优先"和"程序公正优先"的价值取向,是实现"人民民主"的宪法精神、推动刑事司法文明建设、走出价值选择困境的必由之路。
Giving priority to efficiency, giving consideration to justice simultaneously' is a proposition of instrumentalism while 'putting emphasis on both attacking criminals and safeguarding human rights' is a proposition of value balance. Neither is the solution to criminal procedure orientation of value. The value selection of 'giving priority to human rights' and 'giving priority to procedure justice' is the only way to realize 'people's democracy', push forward criminal legislation construction and get out of the value selection predicament.
出处
《中南民族大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第3期93-96,共4页
Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
刑事诉讼
价值选择
国家权力
公民权利
criminal procedure
value selection
state power
citizen right
