本文采用三水平元分析方法,考察了社会排斥与亲社会行为之间的关系及其调节因素。研究共纳入27篇文献,包含38个独立样本,总计139,990名被试。结果表明,社会排斥与亲社会行为之间存在显著的负相关(r = −0.270)。年龄是该关系的调节变量,...本文采用三水平元分析方法,考察了社会排斥与亲社会行为之间的关系及其调节因素。研究共纳入27篇文献,包含38个独立样本,总计139,990名被试。结果表明,社会排斥与亲社会行为之间存在显著的负相关(r = −0.270)。年龄是该关系的调节变量,即随着年龄的增长,社会排斥与亲社会行为的负相关程度减弱。而性别、社会排斥测量工具和亲社会行为测量工具均未发现显著的调节效应。This study systematically explored the relationship between social exclusion and pro-social behavior using a three-level meta-analytic technique. Through searching and screening the literature base, a total of 27 studies were included, containing 38 independent samples and 48 effect sizes, totaling 139,990 subjects. The meta-analytical findings demonstrated a notable inverse relationship between social exclusion and prosocial behaviour (r = −0.270). This empirical evidence suggests that individuals who perceive themselves as socially excluded may exhibit a diminished propensity to engage in behaviors beneficial to others. Subjects’ age played a moderating role, but the instruments measuring social exclusion and pro-social behavior and gender did not. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated the relationship between social exclusion and pro-social behavior and its moderating mechanism in the Chinese sample.展开更多
文摘本文采用三水平元分析方法,考察了社会排斥与亲社会行为之间的关系及其调节因素。研究共纳入27篇文献,包含38个独立样本,总计139,990名被试。结果表明,社会排斥与亲社会行为之间存在显著的负相关(r = −0.270)。年龄是该关系的调节变量,即随着年龄的增长,社会排斥与亲社会行为的负相关程度减弱。而性别、社会排斥测量工具和亲社会行为测量工具均未发现显著的调节效应。This study systematically explored the relationship between social exclusion and pro-social behavior using a three-level meta-analytic technique. Through searching and screening the literature base, a total of 27 studies were included, containing 38 independent samples and 48 effect sizes, totaling 139,990 subjects. The meta-analytical findings demonstrated a notable inverse relationship between social exclusion and prosocial behaviour (r = −0.270). This empirical evidence suggests that individuals who perceive themselves as socially excluded may exhibit a diminished propensity to engage in behaviors beneficial to others. Subjects’ age played a moderating role, but the instruments measuring social exclusion and pro-social behavior and gender did not. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated the relationship between social exclusion and pro-social behavior and its moderating mechanism in the Chinese sample.