Objective: to explore the practical application effect of locking intramedullary nail on tibial and fibular fracture in clinical practice. Methods: 90 patients treated in our hospital were selected as study subjects t...Objective: to explore the practical application effect of locking intramedullary nail on tibial and fibular fracture in clinical practice. Methods: 90 patients treated in our hospital were selected as study subjects to divided patients were 45 patients in each group. The conventional group was treated with pressurized steel plate, and the study group was treated with locked intramedullary nail. The clinical efficacy of both groups, the status of adverse events, various clinical indicators, joint function scores, laboratory results and quality of life were compared. Results: in the comparison of treatment effects, the study group was significantly higher, and the incidence of adverse events was low. In the comparison of clinical efficacy and joint function score, the study group was superior to the conventional group. In the process of comparing the laboratory results of the two groups, the relevant data of the quality of life of the research group was relatively higher. Conclusion: for patients with tibiofibular fracture, the use of interlocking intramedullary nail treatment can significantly improve the experimental results, joint function score and several clinical indicators. At the same time, the possibility of adverse events in patients is low, which will also greatly improve the quality of life and treatment effect, with good safety and effectiveness, which is worth promoting and applying them in clinical practice.展开更多
文摘Objective: to explore the practical application effect of locking intramedullary nail on tibial and fibular fracture in clinical practice. Methods: 90 patients treated in our hospital were selected as study subjects to divided patients were 45 patients in each group. The conventional group was treated with pressurized steel plate, and the study group was treated with locked intramedullary nail. The clinical efficacy of both groups, the status of adverse events, various clinical indicators, joint function scores, laboratory results and quality of life were compared. Results: in the comparison of treatment effects, the study group was significantly higher, and the incidence of adverse events was low. In the comparison of clinical efficacy and joint function score, the study group was superior to the conventional group. In the process of comparing the laboratory results of the two groups, the relevant data of the quality of life of the research group was relatively higher. Conclusion: for patients with tibiofibular fracture, the use of interlocking intramedullary nail treatment can significantly improve the experimental results, joint function score and several clinical indicators. At the same time, the possibility of adverse events in patients is low, which will also greatly improve the quality of life and treatment effect, with good safety and effectiveness, which is worth promoting and applying them in clinical practice.
