股东代表诉讼制度是我国公司法中一项重要的制度,旨在保护公司的合法权益,该制度的引进在我国法律史上具有里程碑意义,填补了立法空白。目前我国关于股东代表诉讼制度适用中出现的问题关注度还不够,在司法实践中,该项制度也未充分发挥...股东代表诉讼制度是我国公司法中一项重要的制度,旨在保护公司的合法权益,该制度的引进在我国法律史上具有里程碑意义,填补了立法空白。目前我国关于股东代表诉讼制度适用中出现的问题关注度还不够,在司法实践中,该项制度也未充分发挥其作用。为一步维护中小股东的合法权益,充分发挥我国股东代表诉讼的保障作用。本文分为四个部分,股东代表诉讼制度价值、股东代表诉讼相关理论的研究、我国股东代表诉讼司法实践中存在的问题和我国股东代表诉讼制度的完善路径。针对我国立法空缺、原告资格限制、诉讼成本高、前置程序规定模糊等问题为切入点展开分析,提出相应的完善对策,以期实现股东代表诉讼制度在司法实践中发挥出其本身应具有的价值。Shareholder representative litigation system is an important system in our company law, aiming at protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the company. The introduction of this system has a milestone significance in our legal history and fills the legislative gap. At present, China has not paid enough attention to the problems in the application of the shareholder representative litigation system, and the system has not fully played its role in judicial practice. In order to safeguard the legal rights and interests of minority shareholders and give full play to the protection role of shareholder representative litigation. This article is divided into four parts, the value of the shareholder representative litigation system, the research of the relevant theories of shareholder representative litigation, the problems existing in the judicial practice of shareholder representative litigation in our country and the perfect path of shareholder representative litigation system in our country. This paper analyzes the problems such as legislative vacancy, plaintiff qualification limitation, high litigation cost and fuzzy pre-procedure, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures to realize the value of shareholder representative litigation system in judicial practice.展开更多
本论文探讨了我国股东代表诉讼中判决既判力主观范围扩张的问题,结合我国《公司法》修订及相关司法解释,分析了股东代表诉讼判决既判力扩张的现状和存在的问题以及背后的原因,重点关注其对公司及其他股东权益保护的影响。通过对股东代...本论文探讨了我国股东代表诉讼中判决既判力主观范围扩张的问题,结合我国《公司法》修订及相关司法解释,分析了股东代表诉讼判决既判力扩张的现状和存在的问题以及背后的原因,重点关注其对公司及其他股东权益保护的影响。通过对股东代表诉讼中原告股东诉讼实施权正当性来源的分析,明确了其与公司的法定诉讼担当关系。提出了在保障其他股东利益的视角下,合理限制股东代表诉讼判决既判力主观范围扩张的路径,以及其他的完善股东代表诉讼制的配套制度:包括完善诉讼告知与通知程序、引入不起诉理由书制度及压缩诉讼成本。This paper delves into the issue of the expansion of the subjective scope of res judicata in shareholder representative litigation in China. By integrating the amendments to China’s “Company Law” and relevant judicial interpretations, it analyzes the current status, existing problems, and underlying causes of the expansion of res judicata in shareholder representative litigation, with a particular focus on its impact on the protection of company and other shareholders’ rights and interests. Through an examination of the legitimacy of the litigation exercise rights of plaintiff shareholders in shareholder representative litigation, the paper clarifies their legal relationship with the company as litigation trustees. From the perspective of safeguarding the interests of other shareholders, the paper proposes pathways to reasonably limit the expansion of the subjective scope of res judicata in shareholder representative litigation and other supporting measures to improve the shareholder representative litigation system, including refining the litigation notification procedures, introducing a system of reasons for not initiating a lawsuit, and reducing litigation costs.展开更多
文摘股东代表诉讼制度是我国公司法中一项重要的制度,旨在保护公司的合法权益,该制度的引进在我国法律史上具有里程碑意义,填补了立法空白。目前我国关于股东代表诉讼制度适用中出现的问题关注度还不够,在司法实践中,该项制度也未充分发挥其作用。为一步维护中小股东的合法权益,充分发挥我国股东代表诉讼的保障作用。本文分为四个部分,股东代表诉讼制度价值、股东代表诉讼相关理论的研究、我国股东代表诉讼司法实践中存在的问题和我国股东代表诉讼制度的完善路径。针对我国立法空缺、原告资格限制、诉讼成本高、前置程序规定模糊等问题为切入点展开分析,提出相应的完善对策,以期实现股东代表诉讼制度在司法实践中发挥出其本身应具有的价值。Shareholder representative litigation system is an important system in our company law, aiming at protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the company. The introduction of this system has a milestone significance in our legal history and fills the legislative gap. At present, China has not paid enough attention to the problems in the application of the shareholder representative litigation system, and the system has not fully played its role in judicial practice. In order to safeguard the legal rights and interests of minority shareholders and give full play to the protection role of shareholder representative litigation. This article is divided into four parts, the value of the shareholder representative litigation system, the research of the relevant theories of shareholder representative litigation, the problems existing in the judicial practice of shareholder representative litigation in our country and the perfect path of shareholder representative litigation system in our country. This paper analyzes the problems such as legislative vacancy, plaintiff qualification limitation, high litigation cost and fuzzy pre-procedure, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures to realize the value of shareholder representative litigation system in judicial practice.
文摘本论文探讨了我国股东代表诉讼中判决既判力主观范围扩张的问题,结合我国《公司法》修订及相关司法解释,分析了股东代表诉讼判决既判力扩张的现状和存在的问题以及背后的原因,重点关注其对公司及其他股东权益保护的影响。通过对股东代表诉讼中原告股东诉讼实施权正当性来源的分析,明确了其与公司的法定诉讼担当关系。提出了在保障其他股东利益的视角下,合理限制股东代表诉讼判决既判力主观范围扩张的路径,以及其他的完善股东代表诉讼制的配套制度:包括完善诉讼告知与通知程序、引入不起诉理由书制度及压缩诉讼成本。This paper delves into the issue of the expansion of the subjective scope of res judicata in shareholder representative litigation in China. By integrating the amendments to China’s “Company Law” and relevant judicial interpretations, it analyzes the current status, existing problems, and underlying causes of the expansion of res judicata in shareholder representative litigation, with a particular focus on its impact on the protection of company and other shareholders’ rights and interests. Through an examination of the legitimacy of the litigation exercise rights of plaintiff shareholders in shareholder representative litigation, the paper clarifies their legal relationship with the company as litigation trustees. From the perspective of safeguarding the interests of other shareholders, the paper proposes pathways to reasonably limit the expansion of the subjective scope of res judicata in shareholder representative litigation and other supporting measures to improve the shareholder representative litigation system, including refining the litigation notification procedures, introducing a system of reasons for not initiating a lawsuit, and reducing litigation costs.
