目的:探讨团体心理干预对改善CPP女童生活质量的作用。方法:选取91例生活质量不佳CPP女童,随机分为对照组44例和治疗组47例,两组均给予GnRHa治疗和随访。对照组接受常规宣教。治疗组在接受对照组治疗方案的基础上,同时接受为期2月的团...目的:探讨团体心理干预对改善CPP女童生活质量的作用。方法:选取91例生活质量不佳CPP女童,随机分为对照组44例和治疗组47例,两组均给予GnRHa治疗和随访。对照组接受常规宣教。治疗组在接受对照组治疗方案的基础上,同时接受为期2月的团体心理干预。干预前、后分别对两组的患儿使用《儿少主观生活质量问卷量表》(ISLQ)、《中文版家庭功能评估量表》(FFAS-C)进行评估。比较两组的ISLQ评分、FFAS-C评分和生长发育情况,了解团体心理干预的影响。结果:与常规治疗相比,治疗组的ISLQ评分更高(P P P > 0.05)。结论:团体心理干预有助于改善CPP女童的家庭功能和生活质量。Objective: To explore the effect of group psychological intervention on improving the quality of life of CPP girls. Methods: Ninety-one CPP girls with poor quality of life were randomly divided into control group (44 cases) and treatment group (47 cases). Both groups were given GnRHa treatment and follow-up. The control group received routine education. In addition to the control group, the treatment group received group psychological intervention for 2 months. Before and after the intervention, the children in the two groups were evaluated by the Subjective Quality of Life Questionnaire (ISLQ) and the Chinese Version of Family Function Assessment Scale (FFAS-C). ISLQ score, FFAS-C score and growth and development of the two groups were compared to find out the effect of group psychological intervention. Results: Compared with the control group, the treatment group had higher ISLQ scores (P 0.05) and lower FFAS-C scores (P 0.05). There was no significant difference between these two groups in growth indicators (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Group psychological intervention can improve the family function and quality of life of CPP girls.展开更多
目的探讨视频化健康教育联合团体心理干预对支气管扩张患者心理弹性、自我护理能力的影响。方法选择2021年1月—2024年1月抚州市临川区人民医院诊治的68例支气管扩张患者,以随机数字表法分为2组,每组34例。对照组采取常规护理,观察组在...目的探讨视频化健康教育联合团体心理干预对支气管扩张患者心理弹性、自我护理能力的影响。方法选择2021年1月—2024年1月抚州市临川区人民医院诊治的68例支气管扩张患者,以随机数字表法分为2组,每组34例。对照组采取常规护理,观察组在对照组基础上采取视频化健康教育联合团体心理干预。对比2组心理弹性、自我护理能力、生活质量。结果干预后,2组心理弹性量表(Connor-Davidson resilience scale,CD-RISC)中坚韧性、力量及乐观评分比干预前增高,且观察组比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,2组修正版自我护理能力评估量表(the Chinese version of theappraisal of self-care agency scale-revised,ASAS-R-C)评分比干预前增高,且观察组比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,2组圣乔治呼吸问卷(St.George's respiratory questionnaire,SGRQ)评分比干预前降低,且观察组比对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论视频化健康教育联合团体心理干预应用于支气管扩张患者可有效改善其心理弹性水平,促进患者自我护理能力及生活质量提升。展开更多
文摘目的:探讨团体心理干预对改善CPP女童生活质量的作用。方法:选取91例生活质量不佳CPP女童,随机分为对照组44例和治疗组47例,两组均给予GnRHa治疗和随访。对照组接受常规宣教。治疗组在接受对照组治疗方案的基础上,同时接受为期2月的团体心理干预。干预前、后分别对两组的患儿使用《儿少主观生活质量问卷量表》(ISLQ)、《中文版家庭功能评估量表》(FFAS-C)进行评估。比较两组的ISLQ评分、FFAS-C评分和生长发育情况,了解团体心理干预的影响。结果:与常规治疗相比,治疗组的ISLQ评分更高(P P P > 0.05)。结论:团体心理干预有助于改善CPP女童的家庭功能和生活质量。Objective: To explore the effect of group psychological intervention on improving the quality of life of CPP girls. Methods: Ninety-one CPP girls with poor quality of life were randomly divided into control group (44 cases) and treatment group (47 cases). Both groups were given GnRHa treatment and follow-up. The control group received routine education. In addition to the control group, the treatment group received group psychological intervention for 2 months. Before and after the intervention, the children in the two groups were evaluated by the Subjective Quality of Life Questionnaire (ISLQ) and the Chinese Version of Family Function Assessment Scale (FFAS-C). ISLQ score, FFAS-C score and growth and development of the two groups were compared to find out the effect of group psychological intervention. Results: Compared with the control group, the treatment group had higher ISLQ scores (P 0.05) and lower FFAS-C scores (P 0.05). There was no significant difference between these two groups in growth indicators (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Group psychological intervention can improve the family function and quality of life of CPP girls.
文摘目的探讨视频化健康教育联合团体心理干预对支气管扩张患者心理弹性、自我护理能力的影响。方法选择2021年1月—2024年1月抚州市临川区人民医院诊治的68例支气管扩张患者,以随机数字表法分为2组,每组34例。对照组采取常规护理,观察组在对照组基础上采取视频化健康教育联合团体心理干预。对比2组心理弹性、自我护理能力、生活质量。结果干预后,2组心理弹性量表(Connor-Davidson resilience scale,CD-RISC)中坚韧性、力量及乐观评分比干预前增高,且观察组比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,2组修正版自我护理能力评估量表(the Chinese version of theappraisal of self-care agency scale-revised,ASAS-R-C)评分比干预前增高,且观察组比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,2组圣乔治呼吸问卷(St.George's respiratory questionnaire,SGRQ)评分比干预前降低,且观察组比对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论视频化健康教育联合团体心理干预应用于支气管扩张患者可有效改善其心理弹性水平,促进患者自我护理能力及生活质量提升。
