为解决执行难问题,最高人民法院提出了失信被执行人信息公开制度。但在其运行的过程中,暴露出该制度与隐私权保护之间的冲突,主要表现为公开内容泄露隐私信息、公开范围侵犯生活安宁、公开条件中对象不明三个方面的困境。隐私权不仅涉...为解决执行难问题,最高人民法院提出了失信被执行人信息公开制度。但在其运行的过程中,暴露出该制度与隐私权保护之间的冲突,主要表现为公开内容泄露隐私信息、公开范围侵犯生活安宁、公开条件中对象不明三个方面的困境。隐私权不仅涉及公民个人安全、合法权益,还会涉及国家和社会的稳定,因此有必要对齐进行制度优化。首先,从制度层面对其进行优化,进一步明确公开的内容,从而更好地统一具体实践;其次,区分公开的范围,依据案件侵害的程度决定是否向整个社会公开;最后,明确公开的条件,规定相应的判断标准,缓解失信被执行人信息公开制度与隐私权保护的矛盾,同时也能更好地发挥该制度的惩戒、威慑和引导作用。To solve the problem of difficult enforcement, the Supreme People’s Court has proposed a system for disclosing the information of dishonest persons subject to enforcement. However, in its operation, the conflict between the system and privacy protection has been exposed, mainly manifested in three difficulties: the leakage of private information in public content, the infringement of peaceful life in the scope of public disclosure, and the lack of clarity in the objects of public disclosure. The right to privacy not only concerns the personal safety and legitimate rights and interests of citizens, but also involves the stability of the country and society. Therefore, it is necessary to align and optimize the system. Firstly, optimize it from the institutional level, further clarify the publicly available content, and better unify specific practices. Secondly, distinguish the scope of disclosure and decide whether to disclose it to the entire society based on the degree of infringement of the case;Finally, clarifying the conditions for disclosure and setting corresponding judgment standards can alleviate the contradiction between the information disclosure system for dishonest persons and privacy protection, while also better playing the punitive, deterrent, and guiding role of the system.展开更多
文摘为解决执行难问题,最高人民法院提出了失信被执行人信息公开制度。但在其运行的过程中,暴露出该制度与隐私权保护之间的冲突,主要表现为公开内容泄露隐私信息、公开范围侵犯生活安宁、公开条件中对象不明三个方面的困境。隐私权不仅涉及公民个人安全、合法权益,还会涉及国家和社会的稳定,因此有必要对齐进行制度优化。首先,从制度层面对其进行优化,进一步明确公开的内容,从而更好地统一具体实践;其次,区分公开的范围,依据案件侵害的程度决定是否向整个社会公开;最后,明确公开的条件,规定相应的判断标准,缓解失信被执行人信息公开制度与隐私权保护的矛盾,同时也能更好地发挥该制度的惩戒、威慑和引导作用。To solve the problem of difficult enforcement, the Supreme People’s Court has proposed a system for disclosing the information of dishonest persons subject to enforcement. However, in its operation, the conflict between the system and privacy protection has been exposed, mainly manifested in three difficulties: the leakage of private information in public content, the infringement of peaceful life in the scope of public disclosure, and the lack of clarity in the objects of public disclosure. The right to privacy not only concerns the personal safety and legitimate rights and interests of citizens, but also involves the stability of the country and society. Therefore, it is necessary to align and optimize the system. Firstly, optimize it from the institutional level, further clarify the publicly available content, and better unify specific practices. Secondly, distinguish the scope of disclosure and decide whether to disclose it to the entire society based on the degree of infringement of the case;Finally, clarifying the conditions for disclosure and setting corresponding judgment standards can alleviate the contradiction between the information disclosure system for dishonest persons and privacy protection, while also better playing the punitive, deterrent, and guiding role of the system.
