We present a female patient with sigmoid colon endometriosis who was diagnosed correctly preoperatively and underwent minimally invasive surgery. She was admitted to our hospital with rectal bleeding and constipation....We present a female patient with sigmoid colon endometriosis who was diagnosed correctly preoperatively and underwent minimally invasive surgery. She was admitted to our hospital with rectal bleeding and constipation. We performed several workups. Colonoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography showed sigmoid colon stenosis caused by submucosal tumor, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a sigmoid colon tumor displaying signal hy- pointensity on both T1- and T2-weighted imaging. However, colonoscopic ultrasonography-assisted needle aspiration biopsy could not specify tumor characteristics. From these examinations, the lesion was diagnosed as sigmoid colon endometriosis and laparoscopy-assisted sigmoidectomy was performed. Pathological diagnosis from the resected specimen was identical to preoperative diagnosis, i.e., colonic endometriosis. Since differential diagnosis of intestinal endometriosis seems difficult, a cautious preoperative diagnosis is required to select treatments including minimally invasive surgery.展开更多
Objective:The purpose of our study was to investigate the feasibility and short-term therapeutic effects of laparoscopic staging operation in women with endometrial carcinoma.Methods:We analyzed 86 patients with endom...Objective:The purpose of our study was to investigate the feasibility and short-term therapeutic effects of laparoscopic staging operation in women with endometrial carcinoma.Methods:We analyzed 86 patients with endometrial carcinoma in PLA general hospital between 2006 and 2009 retrospectively.Thirty-nine patients were performed laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy plus systemic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.Forty-seven patients received traditional abdominal radical hysterectomy plus systemic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.We compared the operation time,blood loss,number of lymph nodes retrieved,time for restoration of gastrointestinal function,postoperative complications and morbidity,the incidence of wound infection,the length of hospital stay,and hospital charges.Results:There was no significant deviation between the two groups in age,clinical stage,and pathology.We found that there was no significant deviation between the two groups in the number of lymph nodes retrieved,postoperative complications,the rate of wound infection or hospital charge(P > 0.05).The laparoscopic group had an advantage in blood loss,time for restoration of gastrointestinal function,time for postoperative hospital stay(P < 0.05).Conclusion:Laparoscopic surgery,as a primary surgical intervention,seems to be a safe and feasible option especially in patients with early endometrial cancer.展开更多
文摘We present a female patient with sigmoid colon endometriosis who was diagnosed correctly preoperatively and underwent minimally invasive surgery. She was admitted to our hospital with rectal bleeding and constipation. We performed several workups. Colonoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography showed sigmoid colon stenosis caused by submucosal tumor, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a sigmoid colon tumor displaying signal hy- pointensity on both T1- and T2-weighted imaging. However, colonoscopic ultrasonography-assisted needle aspiration biopsy could not specify tumor characteristics. From these examinations, the lesion was diagnosed as sigmoid colon endometriosis and laparoscopy-assisted sigmoidectomy was performed. Pathological diagnosis from the resected specimen was identical to preoperative diagnosis, i.e., colonic endometriosis. Since differential diagnosis of intestinal endometriosis seems difficult, a cautious preoperative diagnosis is required to select treatments including minimally invasive surgery.
文摘Objective:The purpose of our study was to investigate the feasibility and short-term therapeutic effects of laparoscopic staging operation in women with endometrial carcinoma.Methods:We analyzed 86 patients with endometrial carcinoma in PLA general hospital between 2006 and 2009 retrospectively.Thirty-nine patients were performed laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy plus systemic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.Forty-seven patients received traditional abdominal radical hysterectomy plus systemic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.We compared the operation time,blood loss,number of lymph nodes retrieved,time for restoration of gastrointestinal function,postoperative complications and morbidity,the incidence of wound infection,the length of hospital stay,and hospital charges.Results:There was no significant deviation between the two groups in age,clinical stage,and pathology.We found that there was no significant deviation between the two groups in the number of lymph nodes retrieved,postoperative complications,the rate of wound infection or hospital charge(P > 0.05).The laparoscopic group had an advantage in blood loss,time for restoration of gastrointestinal function,time for postoperative hospital stay(P < 0.05).Conclusion:Laparoscopic surgery,as a primary surgical intervention,seems to be a safe and feasible option especially in patients with early endometrial cancer.
