研究以针对缺乏对于高校中层管理者变革信念量表开发的研究,通过变革信念文献回顾,提出包含差异信念、适配性信念、效价信念、效应感信念、模仿信念和强制信念六个维度的量表框架和27个问项;之后,基于采集到的356份有效问卷,通过探索性...研究以针对缺乏对于高校中层管理者变革信念量表开发的研究,通过变革信念文献回顾,提出包含差异信念、适配性信念、效价信念、效应感信念、模仿信念和强制信念六个维度的量表框架和27个问项;之后,基于采集到的356份有效问卷,通过探索性和验证性因子分析,形成了包含24个测量题目的高校中层管理者变革信念量表。The study addresses the lack of research on the development of a scale for measuring change beliefs of middle-level managers in higher education institutions. Through a literature review on change beliefs, a scale framework encompassing six dimensions—differential beliefs, adaptability beliefs, valence beliefs, efficacy beliefs, imitation beliefs, and coercion beliefs—along with 27 items is proposed. Subsequently, based on 356 valid questionnaires collected, an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, resulting in a refined scale, consisting of 24 measurement items, for measuring change beliefs of middle-level managers in higher education institutions.展开更多
文摘研究以针对缺乏对于高校中层管理者变革信念量表开发的研究,通过变革信念文献回顾,提出包含差异信念、适配性信念、效价信念、效应感信念、模仿信念和强制信念六个维度的量表框架和27个问项;之后,基于采集到的356份有效问卷,通过探索性和验证性因子分析,形成了包含24个测量题目的高校中层管理者变革信念量表。The study addresses the lack of research on the development of a scale for measuring change beliefs of middle-level managers in higher education institutions. Through a literature review on change beliefs, a scale framework encompassing six dimensions—differential beliefs, adaptability beliefs, valence beliefs, efficacy beliefs, imitation beliefs, and coercion beliefs—along with 27 items is proposed. Subsequently, based on 356 valid questionnaires collected, an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, resulting in a refined scale, consisting of 24 measurement items, for measuring change beliefs of middle-level managers in higher education institutions.
