BACKGROUND Global education in psychiatry is heavily influenced by knowledge from Western,high-income countries,which obscures local voices and expertise.AIM To adapt a human simulation model to psychiatric education ...BACKGROUND Global education in psychiatry is heavily influenced by knowledge from Western,high-income countries,which obscures local voices and expertise.AIM To adapt a human simulation model to psychiatric education in a context that is specific to local languages and cultures.METHODS We conducted an observational study consisting of six human simulation sessions with standardized patients from two host countries,speaking their native languages,and following an adaptation of the co-constructive patient simulation(CCPS)model.As local faculty became increasingly familiar with the CCPS approach,they took on the role of facilitators—in their country’s native language.RESULTS Fifty-three learners participated:19 child and adolescent psychiatry trainees and 3 faculty members in Türkiye(as a group that met online during 3 consecutive months);and 24 trainees and 7 faculty in Israel(divided into 3 groups,in parallel in-person sessions during a single training day).Each of the six cases reflected local realities and clinical challenges,and was associated with specific learning goals identified by each case-writing trainee.CONCLUSION Human simulation has not been fully incorporated into psychiatric education:The creation of immersive clinical experiences and the strengthening of reflective practice are two areas ripe for development.Our adaptations of CCPS can also strengthen local and regional networks and psychiatric communities of practice.Finally,the model can help question and press against hegemonies in psychiatric training that overshadow local expertise.展开更多
The simulated patient methodology(SPM)is considered the“gold standard”as covert participatory observation.SPM is attracting increasing interest for the investigation of community pharmacy practice;however,there is c...The simulated patient methodology(SPM)is considered the“gold standard”as covert participatory observation.SPM is attracting increasing interest for the investigation of community pharmacy practice;however,there is criticism that SPM can only show a small picture of everyday pharmacy practice and therefore has limited external validity.On the one hand,a certain design and application of the SPM goes hand in hand with an increase in external validity.Even if,on the other hand,this occurs at the expense of internal validity due to the trade-off situation,the justified criticism of the SPM for investigating community pharmacy practice can be countered.展开更多
目的探讨案例分析教学法(case-basedlearning,CBL)联合教师标准化病人(teacher-standardized patient,TSP)在卒中后神经源性膀胱医患沟通教学中的应用效果。方法纳入首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院接受规范化培训的60名住院医师,随机分...目的探讨案例分析教学法(case-basedlearning,CBL)联合教师标准化病人(teacher-standardized patient,TSP)在卒中后神经源性膀胱医患沟通教学中的应用效果。方法纳入首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院接受规范化培训的60名住院医师,随机分为对照组和试验组。对照组采用传统以授课为导向的教学法,试验组采用CBL联合TSP的教学方法。教学内容为卒中后神经源性膀胱的医患沟通,共计12学时。教学结束后使用TSP和医患沟通技能评价量表(set the stage,elicit information,give information,understand the patient’s perspective,and end the encounter;SEGUE)评估住院医师的医患沟通能力。结果对照组和试验组在年龄、性别、入组前理论考试分数及操作考试分数方面差异无统计学意义。教学结束后,试验组在SEGUE的问诊准备[(4.6±0.6)分vs.(3.7±0.8)分,P<0.0001]、信息采集[(8.6±1.1)分vs.(7.3±0.9)分,P<0.0001]、信息提供[(3.7±0.5)分vs.(3.3±0.6)分,P=0.0099]、患者理解[(3.5±0.4)分vs.(2.4±0.7)分,P<0.0001]及总分[(22.1±1.5)分vs.(18.5±2.0)分,P<0.0001]方面均显著高于对照组,在问诊结束[(1.7±0.6)分vs.(1.7±0.5)分,P=0.6305]方面与对照组差异无统计学意义。结论采用CBL联合TSP的教学方法能够显著提高住院医师在卒中后神经源性膀胱医患沟通方面的能力。这一教学策略有望成为医学教育中提高医患沟通技能的有效手段,从而提高医疗服务质量。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Global education in psychiatry is heavily influenced by knowledge from Western,high-income countries,which obscures local voices and expertise.AIM To adapt a human simulation model to psychiatric education in a context that is specific to local languages and cultures.METHODS We conducted an observational study consisting of six human simulation sessions with standardized patients from two host countries,speaking their native languages,and following an adaptation of the co-constructive patient simulation(CCPS)model.As local faculty became increasingly familiar with the CCPS approach,they took on the role of facilitators—in their country’s native language.RESULTS Fifty-three learners participated:19 child and adolescent psychiatry trainees and 3 faculty members in Türkiye(as a group that met online during 3 consecutive months);and 24 trainees and 7 faculty in Israel(divided into 3 groups,in parallel in-person sessions during a single training day).Each of the six cases reflected local realities and clinical challenges,and was associated with specific learning goals identified by each case-writing trainee.CONCLUSION Human simulation has not been fully incorporated into psychiatric education:The creation of immersive clinical experiences and the strengthening of reflective practice are two areas ripe for development.Our adaptations of CCPS can also strengthen local and regional networks and psychiatric communities of practice.Finally,the model can help question and press against hegemonies in psychiatric training that overshadow local expertise.
文摘The simulated patient methodology(SPM)is considered the“gold standard”as covert participatory observation.SPM is attracting increasing interest for the investigation of community pharmacy practice;however,there is criticism that SPM can only show a small picture of everyday pharmacy practice and therefore has limited external validity.On the one hand,a certain design and application of the SPM goes hand in hand with an increase in external validity.Even if,on the other hand,this occurs at the expense of internal validity due to the trade-off situation,the justified criticism of the SPM for investigating community pharmacy practice can be countered.
文摘目的探讨案例分析教学法(case-basedlearning,CBL)联合教师标准化病人(teacher-standardized patient,TSP)在卒中后神经源性膀胱医患沟通教学中的应用效果。方法纳入首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院接受规范化培训的60名住院医师,随机分为对照组和试验组。对照组采用传统以授课为导向的教学法,试验组采用CBL联合TSP的教学方法。教学内容为卒中后神经源性膀胱的医患沟通,共计12学时。教学结束后使用TSP和医患沟通技能评价量表(set the stage,elicit information,give information,understand the patient’s perspective,and end the encounter;SEGUE)评估住院医师的医患沟通能力。结果对照组和试验组在年龄、性别、入组前理论考试分数及操作考试分数方面差异无统计学意义。教学结束后,试验组在SEGUE的问诊准备[(4.6±0.6)分vs.(3.7±0.8)分,P<0.0001]、信息采集[(8.6±1.1)分vs.(7.3±0.9)分,P<0.0001]、信息提供[(3.7±0.5)分vs.(3.3±0.6)分,P=0.0099]、患者理解[(3.5±0.4)分vs.(2.4±0.7)分,P<0.0001]及总分[(22.1±1.5)分vs.(18.5±2.0)分,P<0.0001]方面均显著高于对照组,在问诊结束[(1.7±0.6)分vs.(1.7±0.5)分,P=0.6305]方面与对照组差异无统计学意义。结论采用CBL联合TSP的教学方法能够显著提高住院医师在卒中后神经源性膀胱医患沟通方面的能力。这一教学策略有望成为医学教育中提高医患沟通技能的有效手段,从而提高医疗服务质量。
