This paper proposes two kinds of approximate proximal point algorithms （APPA） for monotone variational inequalities, both of which can be viewed as two extended versions of Solodov and Svaiter＇s APPA in the paper ...This paper proposes two kinds of approximate proximal point algorithms （APPA） for monotone variational inequalities, both of which can be viewed as two extended versions of Solodov and Svaiter＇s APPA in the paper ＂Error bounds for proximal point subproblems and associated inexact proximal point algorithms＂ published in 2000. They are both prediction- correction methods which use the same inexactness restriction; the only difference is that they use different search directions in the correction steps. This paper also chooses an optimal step size in the two versions of the APPA to improve the profit at each iteration. Analysis also shows that the two APPAs are globally convergent under appropriate assumptions, and we can expect algorithm 2 to get more progress in every iteration than algorithm 1. Numerical experiments indicate that algorithm 2 is more efficient than algorithm 1 with the same correction step size,展开更多
In order to find roots of maximal monotone operators, this paper introduces and studies the modified approximate proximal point algorithm with an error sequence {e k} such that || ek || \leqslant hk || xk - [(x)\tilde...In order to find roots of maximal monotone operators, this paper introduces and studies the modified approximate proximal point algorithm with an error sequence {e k} such that || ek || \leqslant hk || xk - [(x)\tilde]k ||\left\| { e^k } \right\| \leqslant \eta _k \left\| { x^k - \tilde x^k } \right\| with ?k = 0￥ ( hk - 1 ) < + ￥\sum\limits_{k = 0}^\infty {\left( {\eta _k - 1} \right)} and infk \geqslant 0 hk = m\geqslant 1\mathop {\inf }\limits_{k \geqslant 0} \eta _k = \mu \geqslant 1 . Here, the restrictions on {η k} are very different from the ones on {η k}, given by He et al (Science in China Ser. A, 2002, 32 (11): 1026–1032.) that supk \geqslant 0 hk = v < 1\mathop {\sup }\limits_{k \geqslant 0} \eta _k = v . Moreover, the characteristic conditions of the convergence of the modified approximate proximal point algorithm are presented by virtue of the new technique very different from the ones given by He et al.展开更多
文摘This paper proposes two kinds of approximate proximal point algorithms （APPA） for monotone variational inequalities, both of which can be viewed as two extended versions of Solodov and Svaiter＇s APPA in the paper ＂Error bounds for proximal point subproblems and associated inexact proximal point algorithms＂ published in 2000. They are both prediction- correction methods which use the same inexactness restriction; the only difference is that they use different search directions in the correction steps. This paper also chooses an optimal step size in the two versions of the APPA to improve the profit at each iteration. Analysis also shows that the two APPAs are globally convergent under appropriate assumptions, and we can expect algorithm 2 to get more progress in every iteration than algorithm 1. Numerical experiments indicate that algorithm 2 is more efficient than algorithm 1 with the same correction step size,
基金Supported both by the Teaching and Research Award Fund for Outstanding Young Teachers inHigher Educational Institutions of MOEChinaand by the Dawn Program Fund in Shanghai
文摘In order to find roots of maximal monotone operators, this paper introduces and studies the modified approximate proximal point algorithm with an error sequence {e k} such that || ek || \leqslant hk || xk - [(x)\tilde]k ||\left\| { e^k } \right\| \leqslant \eta _k \left\| { x^k - \tilde x^k } \right\| with ?k = 0￥ ( hk - 1 ) < + ￥\sum\limits_{k = 0}^\infty {\left( {\eta _k - 1} \right)} and infk \geqslant 0 hk = m\geqslant 1\mathop {\inf }\limits_{k \geqslant 0} \eta _k = \mu \geqslant 1 . Here, the restrictions on {η k} are very different from the ones on {η k}, given by He et al (Science in China Ser. A, 2002, 32 (11): 1026–1032.) that supk \geqslant 0 hk = v < 1\mathop {\sup }\limits_{k \geqslant 0} \eta _k = v . Moreover, the characteristic conditions of the convergence of the modified approximate proximal point algorithm are presented by virtue of the new technique very different from the ones given by He et al.
