Objective: The experiment will implement comprehensive health education and nursing program for urology patients, and make statistical analysis of the actual effect after application. Methods: For the treatment of 120...Objective: The experiment will implement comprehensive health education and nursing program for urology patients, and make statistical analysis of the actual effect after application. Methods: For the treatment of 120 cases of urology patients, the samples selected from January 2020 to December 2021 patients, and according to the order of divided into two groups, control group for routine nursing, observation group for comprehensive health education nursing program, compare the results. Results: In the SF-36 quality of life scale, patients in the observation group scored higher, and their personal feelings in various aspects of daily life were higher than those in the control group (P0.05). At the same time, in the emotional management of patients, through appropriate intervention, the observation group patients psychological state is good, the impact of anxiety and depression on individuals is weakened, and the score is lower in the professional scale evaluation, compared with the control group, the difference is large (P 0.05). Finally, there was a difference in the disease knowledge mastery rate between the two groups. The observation group (91.67%) was significantly higher than the control group (68.33%), with statistical significance (P 0.05). Conclusion: urology disease problem affects the patients healthy life, and because of the location privacy, in the treatment of patients unable to contend with in the process, even avoid treatment, unable to effectively solve this can lead to disease, eventually cause more serious consequences, so we must strengthen the health education, rehabilitation treatment for patients, and provide support to establish a correct concept of diseases.展开更多
文摘Objective: The experiment will implement comprehensive health education and nursing program for urology patients, and make statistical analysis of the actual effect after application. Methods: For the treatment of 120 cases of urology patients, the samples selected from January 2020 to December 2021 patients, and according to the order of divided into two groups, control group for routine nursing, observation group for comprehensive health education nursing program, compare the results. Results: In the SF-36 quality of life scale, patients in the observation group scored higher, and their personal feelings in various aspects of daily life were higher than those in the control group (P0.05). At the same time, in the emotional management of patients, through appropriate intervention, the observation group patients psychological state is good, the impact of anxiety and depression on individuals is weakened, and the score is lower in the professional scale evaluation, compared with the control group, the difference is large (P 0.05). Finally, there was a difference in the disease knowledge mastery rate between the two groups. The observation group (91.67%) was significantly higher than the control group (68.33%), with statistical significance (P 0.05). Conclusion: urology disease problem affects the patients healthy life, and because of the location privacy, in the treatment of patients unable to contend with in the process, even avoid treatment, unable to effectively solve this can lead to disease, eventually cause more serious consequences, so we must strengthen the health education, rehabilitation treatment for patients, and provide support to establish a correct concept of diseases.
